vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) and Aurora Mobile Ltd (JG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aurora Mobile Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.0M vs $13.6M, roughly 1.8× Five Point Holdings, LLC). Aurora Mobile Ltd runs the higher net margin — -1.4% vs -16.4%, a 15.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Five Point Holdings, LLC is a leading U.S. real estate development company that focuses on planning and constructing large-scale master-planned mixed-use communities in high-demand markets across California. Its projects integrate residential housing, commercial office spaces, retail outlets, public amenities and recreational facilities to build vibrant, sustainable living and working environments for local populations.
Aurora Innovation, Inc., doing business as Aurora, is a self-driving vehicle technology company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Aurora has developed the Aurora Driver, a computer system that can be integrated into cars for autonomous driving. It was co-founded by Chris Urmson, the former chief technology officer of Google/Alphabet Inc.'s self-driving team, which became known as Waymo, as well as by Sterling Anderson, former head of Tesla Autopilot, and Drew Bagnell, former head of Uber's a...
FPH vs JG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.6M | $25.0M |
| Net Profit | $-2.2M | $-360.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 66.3% |
| Operating Margin | -43.5% | -1.4% |
| Net Margin | -16.4% | -1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -109.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $13.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $75.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $25.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.8M | $43.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $-360.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.0M | $-965.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 66.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 66.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | -43.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 89.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 87.5% | -3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 83.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 86.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | -16.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 77.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 156.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.4% | -1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 177.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.7% | -2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.8% | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $332.6M | $16.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $9.0M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $53.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $332.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $425.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $351.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $456.6M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $528.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $430.9M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $53.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $51.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-44.5M | $795.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $772.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 3.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-44.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-71.6M | $795.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.0M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-23.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-71.7M | $772.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.2M | $553.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-23.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 138.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -959.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 430.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 72.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -106.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -46.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.79× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.58× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.77× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.58× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
