vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JFrog Ltd (FROG) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($184.5M vs $145.3M, roughly 1.3× JFrog Ltd). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -10.5%, a 17.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs 25.2%). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.8M vs $49.9M). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 20.4%).
JFrog Ltd is a global DevOps technology provider that delivers end-to-end software release, artifact management, and security solutions. It serves clients across tech, finance, retail, and manufacturing sectors, helping teams streamline development and delivery workflows for cloud, on-premises, and hybrid infrastructure.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
FROG vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $145.3M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $-15.2M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | 77.9% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -14.7% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | -10.5% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 25.2% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 34.4% | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.13 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $145.3M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.9M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.2M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $122.4M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.1M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.1M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.0M | $199.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $100.3M | $95.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.2M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.4M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.7M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.5M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.3M | $24.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.8M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | 77.9% | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.4% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.3% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.3% | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.4% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.0% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 78.8% | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 79.5% | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | -14.7% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.4% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.9% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.4% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.6% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | -10.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -21.0% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.9% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.8% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.13 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.14 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.19 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.21 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.21 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $1.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $704.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $887.4M | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $704.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $651.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $611.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $563.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $522.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $467.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $579.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $887.4M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $859.4M | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $826.5M | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $800.0M | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $773.5M | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $756.2M | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $721.4M | $236.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $707.8M | $217.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $617.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $997.1M | $577.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $50.7M | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $49.9M | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 34.3% | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $142.3M | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $50.7M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.1M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.1M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.6M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $-21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $49.9M | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.8M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.1M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.5M | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.7M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $836.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.6M | $-22.4M |
| Q4 25 | 34.3% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.9% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.0% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.8% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.6% | -23.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FROG
Segment breakdown not available.
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
