vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FRP HOLDINGS, INC. (FRPH) and TH International Ltd (THCH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FRP HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($10.9M vs $6.6M, roughly 1.6× TH International Ltd). FRP HOLDINGS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 1.3% vs -41.2%, a 42.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
FRP Advisory is a business advisory firm based in the United Kingdom, providing restructuring, corporate finance, debt advisory, forensic accounting and financial advisory and is one of the UK’s largest specialists in the area of corporate restructuring.
TH International Ltd is the exclusive operator of the Tim Hortons coffee brand in mainland China. It offers freshly brewed coffee, artisanal baked goods, light meals and branded peripheral products, operating physical offline stores and third-party delivery channels, targeting young urban consumers across tier 1, tier 2 and tier 3 cities in China.
FRPH vs THCH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.9M | $6.6M |
| Net Profit | $139.0K | $-2.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.4% | -37.3% |
| Net Margin | 1.3% | -41.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -91.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.1M | $6.6M |
| Q4 25 | $139.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $662.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $578.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | -37.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.8% | -41.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $192.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $428.5M | — |
| Total Assets | $735.1M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.45× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $134.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $156.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $152.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $192.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $185.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $180.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $178.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $428.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $427.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $426.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $425.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $423.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $420.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $419.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $416.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $735.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $731.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $722.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $717.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $728.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $726.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $711.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $705.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.43× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.7M | $-511 |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-21.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -196.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 468.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 213.50× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-34.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9M | $-511 |
| Q4 25 | $-21.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-28.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | -196.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -157.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -210.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -265.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -32.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 468.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 232.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 486.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 325.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 61.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 213.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.65× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.96× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.23× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FRPH
| Other | $5.6M | 51% |
| Multifamily Segment | $5.3M | 49% |
THCH
Segment breakdown not available.
