vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fastly, Inc. (FSLY) and RADWARE LTD (RDWR), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fastly, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($172.6M vs $75.3M, roughly 2.3× RADWARE LTD). RADWARE LTD runs the higher net margin — -9.0% vs 7.5%, a 16.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Fastly, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 7.1%).
Fastly, Inc. is an American company based in San Francisco, which describes itself as a cloud computing company. Fastly provides content delivery network services, image optimization, and load balancing services. Fastly's cloud security services include denial-of-service attack protection, bot mitigation, and a web application firewall.
Radware Ltd. is an American provider of cybersecurity and application delivery products for physical, cloud and software-defined data centers. Radware's corporate headquarters are located in Mahwah, New Jersey. The company also has offices in Europe, Africa and Asia Pacific regions. The company's global headquarters is in Israel. Radware is a member of the Rad Group of companies and its shares are traded on NASDAQ.
FSLY vs RDWR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $172.6M | $75.3M |
| Net Profit | $-15.5M | $5.7M |
| Gross Margin | 61.4% | 80.7% |
| Operating Margin | -8.7% | 4.1% |
| Net Margin | -9.0% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 22.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 52.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $172.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $158.2M | $75.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.7M | $74.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.5M | $72.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.2M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.4M | $67.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $133.5M | $65.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-29.5M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.5M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-39.1M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-38.0M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.7M | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-43.4M | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.4% | 80.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.5% | 80.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.2% | 80.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.5% | 80.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.1% | 80.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.8% | 80.3% |
| Q4 25 | -8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -26.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.6% | -0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -35.3% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -34.6% | -5.6% |
| Q4 25 | -9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.2% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -32.5% | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.26 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.27 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.27 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.32 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.32 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $361.8M | $98.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $929.6M | $357.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $618.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $361.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.9M | $98.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $321.2M | $98.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $307.3M | $98.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $295.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $308.2M | $70.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $311.8M | $70.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $329.5M | $70.5M |
| Q4 25 | $929.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.0M | $357.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $942.6M | $357.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $957.0M | $357.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $965.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $969.5M | $323.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $981.2M | $323.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $991.8M | $323.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $618.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $618.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $618.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $571.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $571.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $571.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $22.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $12.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 5.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $65.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $22.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.8M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | $22.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.9M | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.9M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7M | $21.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.7M | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.2% | 29.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.1% | 32.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.17× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FSLY
| Network Services | $130.8M | 76% |
| Security | $35.4M | 21% |
| Other | $6.4M | 4% |
RDWR
Segment breakdown not available.
