vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP (FSP) and GENCOR INDUSTRIES INC (GENC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.0M vs $23.6M, roughly 1.1× GENCOR INDUSTRIES INC). GENCOR INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 14.6% vs -28.1%, a 42.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-8.2% vs -25.0%). GENCOR INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($10.1M vs $-12.7M). Over the past eight quarters, FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP's revenue compounded faster (-8.7% CAGR vs -23.9%).
Franklin Street Properties Corp is a Massachusetts-based real estate investment trust (REIT) in the United States. It primarily invests in, owns, and operates high-quality office properties across major U.S. metropolitan markets, serving corporate tenants across various industry segments, and delivers stable long-term returns via rental income and strategic asset management.
Gencor Industries Inc is a leading manufacturer of heavy construction and infrastructure equipment, specializing in asphalt production plants, thermal combustion systems, and supporting road-building machinery. It primarily serves North American and global construction markets, supplying products to both public sector infrastructure projects and private commercial construction operators.
FSP vs GENC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.0M | $23.6M |
| Net Profit | $-7.3M | $3.4M |
| Gross Margin | 59.4% | 28.7% |
| Operating Margin | -27.9% | 13.2% |
| Net Margin | -28.1% | 14.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | -25.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.1% | -9.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | $23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.3M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $38.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.4M | $31.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.7M | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.8M | $25.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.2M | $40.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.3M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.3M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.9M | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.4M | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.5M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.6M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.0M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.6M | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | 59.4% | 28.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.9% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.9% | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.8% | 29.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.0% | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.2% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 64.7% | 30.3% |
| Q4 25 | -27.9% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | -1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.2% | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -78.9% | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.9% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.0% | 17.4% |
| Q4 25 | -28.1% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.5% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -79.1% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.0% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.2% | 15.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | $0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.6M | $147.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $607.0M | $215.2M |
| Total Assets | $892.9M | $228.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.6M | $147.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4M | $136.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.4M | $136.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | $143.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.1M | $130.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.9M | $115.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2M | $116.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.2M | $117.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $607.0M | $215.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $615.3M | $211.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $624.7M | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.4M | $206.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $655.9M | $200.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $665.4M | $196.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $682.1M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $703.9M | $192.1M |
| Q4 25 | $892.9M | $228.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $901.0M | $222.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $903.2M | $220.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $916.4M | $223.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $946.9M | $218.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $981.5M | $208.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $201.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $206.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.8M | $11.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.7M | $10.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -48.6% | 43.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 63.0% | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.23× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-25.3M | $-3.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.8M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $-275.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $-23.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.5M | $12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-648.0K | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.7M | $10.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $-24.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.9M | $12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | $14.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.1M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.8M | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | -48.6% | 43.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.5% | -90.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.7% | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.2% | 46.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.7% | -5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -50.8% | 28.7% |
| Q4 25 | 63.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.87× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.