vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP (FSP) and Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.0M vs $14.6M, roughly 1.8× Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs -28.1%, a 92.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs -8.2%). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.2M vs $-12.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.2% CAGR vs -8.7%).
Franklin Street Properties Corp is a Massachusetts-based real estate investment trust (REIT) in the United States. It primarily invests in, owns, and operates high-quality office properties across major U.S. metropolitan markets, serving corporate tenants across various industry segments, and delivers stable long-term returns via rental income and strategic asset management.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
FSP vs IDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.0M | $14.6M |
| Net Profit | $-7.3M | $9.4M |
| Gross Margin | 59.4% | 68.5% |
| Operating Margin | -27.9% | 62.4% |
| Net Margin | -28.1% | 64.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | 92.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.1% | 220.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.3M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.4M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.7M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.8M | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.2M | $5.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.3M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.3M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.9M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.4M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.5M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.6M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.0M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.6M | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | 59.4% | 68.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.9% | 63.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.9% | 57.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.8% | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | 53.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.0% | 48.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.2% | 50.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 64.7% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | -27.9% | 62.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.2% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -78.9% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.9% | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.4% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.0% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.0% | 36.3% |
| Q4 25 | -28.1% | 64.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.5% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -79.1% | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.0% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.6% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.2% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.2% | 36.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $607.0M | $108.2M |
| Total Assets | $892.9M | $116.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.2M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | $607.0M | $108.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $615.3M | $74.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $624.7M | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.4M | $39.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $655.9M | $37.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $665.4M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $682.1M | $25.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $703.9M | $21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $892.9M | $116.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $901.0M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $903.2M | $57.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $916.4M | $48.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $946.9M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $981.5M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $32.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $28.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.8M | $10.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.7M | $8.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -48.6% | 56.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 63.0% | 17.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-25.3M | $12.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.8M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.5M | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-648.0K | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.7M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $709.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.9M | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.8M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | -48.6% | 56.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.5% | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.7% | 13.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.2% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.7% | 38.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -50.8% | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | 63.0% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
