vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP (FSP) and Mastech Digital, Inc. (MHH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Mastech Digital, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($45.5M vs $26.0M, roughly 1.7× FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP). Mastech Digital, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 2.1% vs -28.1%, a 30.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-8.2% vs -10.4%). Mastech Digital, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.3M vs $-12.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Mastech Digital, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.5% CAGR vs -8.7%).
Franklin Street Properties Corp is a Massachusetts-based real estate investment trust (REIT) in the United States. It primarily invests in, owns, and operates high-quality office properties across major U.S. metropolitan markets, serving corporate tenants across various industry segments, and delivers stable long-term returns via rental income and strategic asset management.
Mastech Digital, Inc. is a digital transformation and information technology (IT) services company headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, providing services to corporations across North America, Middle East, Asian, and Japan.
FSP vs MHH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.0M | $45.5M |
| Net Profit | $-7.3M | $972.0K |
| Gross Margin | 59.4% | 28.3% |
| Operating Margin | -27.9% | 2.2% |
| Net Margin | -28.1% | 2.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | -10.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.1% | 227.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | $45.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.3M | $48.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | $49.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.4M | $50.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.7M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.8M | $49.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.2M | $46.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.3M | $972.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.3M | $941.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.9M | $135.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.4M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.5M | $297.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.6M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.6M | $-161.0K |
| Q4 25 | 59.4% | 28.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.9% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.9% | 28.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.8% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | 29.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.0% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.2% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 64.7% | 25.9% |
| Q4 25 | -27.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -78.9% | -3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.0% | -0.9% |
| Q4 25 | -28.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -79.1% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.6% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.2% | -0.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.6M | $36.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $607.0M | $89.3M |
| Total Assets | $892.9M | $111.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.6M | $36.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4M | $32.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.4M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | $24.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.1M | $27.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.9M | $23.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2M | $20.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.2M | $19.4M |
| Q4 25 | $607.0M | $89.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $615.3M | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $624.7M | $87.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.4M | $86.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $655.9M | $87.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $665.4M | $86.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $682.1M | $84.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $703.9M | $81.7M |
| Q4 25 | $892.9M | $111.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $901.0M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $903.2M | $110.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $916.4M | $110.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $946.9M | $111.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $981.5M | $111.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $107.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $106.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.8M | $4.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.7M | $4.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -48.6% | 9.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 63.0% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-25.3M | $10.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.8M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.5M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-648.0K | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | $-1.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.7M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.9M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.1M | $707.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.8M | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | -48.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.5% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.7% | -6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -50.8% | -3.4% |
| Q4 25 | 63.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.88× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.76× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FSP
Segment breakdown not available.
MHH
| IT Staffing Services | $37.6M | 83% |
| Data And Analytics Services | $7.8M | 17% |
