vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP (FSP) and NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP (NTIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.0M vs $23.3M, roughly 1.1× NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP). NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 1.0% vs -28.1%, a 29.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.2% vs -8.2%). NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-479.7K vs $-12.7M). Over the past eight quarters, NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (5.8% CAGR vs -8.7%).
Franklin Street Properties Corp is a Massachusetts-based real estate investment trust (REIT) in the United States. It primarily invests in, owns, and operates high-quality office properties across major U.S. metropolitan markets, serving corporate tenants across various industry segments, and delivers stable long-term returns via rental income and strategic asset management.
Maxar Technologies Inc., was an American space technology company, specializing in geospatial intelligence, Earth observation, and on-orbit satellite servicing, satellite products, and related services. DigitalGlobe and MDA Holdings Company merged to become Maxar Technologies on October 5, 2017.
FSP vs NTIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.0M | $23.3M |
| Net Profit | $-7.3M | $237.8K |
| Gross Margin | 59.4% | 36.0% |
| Operating Margin | -27.9% | 4.0% |
| Net Margin | -28.1% | 1.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | 9.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.1% | -57.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.3M | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $19.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.4M | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.7M | $23.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.8M | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.2M | $20.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.3M | $237.8K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.3M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.9M | $121.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.4M | $434.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.5M | $561.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.6M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.0M | $976.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.6M | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | 59.4% | 36.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.9% | 37.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.9% | 38.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.8% | 35.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.0% | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.2% | 38.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 64.7% | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | -27.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -78.9% | -1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.9% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.4% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.0% | 10.6% |
| Q4 25 | -28.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -79.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.6% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.2% | 8.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.6M | $6.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $607.0M | $72.4M |
| Total Assets | $892.9M | $104.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.6M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4M | $7.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.4M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.1M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.9M | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2M | $5.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.2M | $4.8M |
| Q4 25 | $607.0M | $72.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $615.3M | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $624.7M | $72.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.4M | $69.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $655.9M | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $665.4M | $71.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $682.1M | $68.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $703.9M | $68.4M |
| Q4 25 | $892.9M | $104.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $901.0M | $102.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $903.2M | $99.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $916.4M | $93.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $946.9M | $94.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $981.5M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $89.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $87.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.8M | $341.9K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.7M | $-479.7K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -48.6% | -2.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 63.0% | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-25.3M | $-1.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.8M | $341.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $609.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.5M | $803.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-648.0K | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-12.7M | $-479.7K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $-171.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.9M | $293.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.1M | $869.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | -48.6% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.5% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -50.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 63.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.9% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.99× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FSP
Segment breakdown not available.
NTIC
| Inside The USA To Unaffiliated Customers | $7.5M | 32% |
| Natur Tec | $6.0M | 26% |
| Acobal | $3.6M | 15% |
| Other | $2.7M | 12% |
| BR | $2.1M | 9% |
| Zerust OY | $1.4M | 6% |
