vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP (FSS) and POTLATCHDELTIC CORP (PCH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($597.1M vs $314.2M, roughly 1.9× POTLATCHDELTIC CORP). FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 10.2% vs 8.2%, a 1.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.5% vs 23.1%). FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($89.5M vs $50.1M). Over the past eight quarters, FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (18.5% CAGR vs 11.1%).
The Federal Signal Company was an American manufacturer of railway signaling equipment in the early 20th century. It was located in Albany, New York.
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPPCHEarnings & Financial Report
PotlatchDeltic Corporation is an American diversified forest products company based in Spokane, Washington.
FSS vs PCH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $597.1M | $314.2M |
| Net Profit | $60.8M | $25.9M |
| Gross Margin | 28.4% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | 14.0% | 11.2% |
| Net Margin | 10.2% | 8.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 26.5% | 23.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.6% | 682.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.99 | $0.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $597.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $555.0M | $314.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $564.6M | $275.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.8M | $268.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $472.0M | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.2M | $255.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $490.4M | $320.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $424.9M | $228.1M |
| Q4 25 | $60.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.1M | $25.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.4M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.3M | $25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.0M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.9M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.8M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $-305.0K |
| Q4 25 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.0% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.2% | 17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.4% | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.3% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.9% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.5% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.8% | -2.1% |
| Q4 25 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.1% | -0.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.99 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.11 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.16 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.75 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.80 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.87 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.99 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.84 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.7M | $88.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $564.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.41× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.4M | $88.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.7M | $95.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.5M | $147.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $91.1M | $151.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.7M | $161.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.6M | $199.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.9M | $180.2M |
| Q4 25 | $564.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $258.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $266.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $223.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $248.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $266.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.17× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.26× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $97.2M | $65.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $89.5M | $50.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.0% | 15.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.60× | 2.54× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $227.1M | $132.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $97.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.1M | $65.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.7M | $41.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.7M | $49.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $45.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.8M | $26.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.6M | $100.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.3M | $16.0M |
| Q4 25 | $89.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.1M | $50.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.4M | $30.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.1M | $26.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.1M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.9M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.8M | $72.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.9M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.7% | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.8% | -3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 22.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.90× | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.84× | 5.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.79× | 1.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | 8.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.28× | 7.99× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.67× | 7.35× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.61× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FSS
| Vehiclesandequipment | $403.4M | 68% |
| Parts | $66.8M | 11% |
| Publicsafetyandsecurityequipment | $62.2M | 10% |
| Rentalincome | $19.0M | 3% |
| Industrialsignalingequipment | $18.2M | 3% |
| Other | $14.9M | 2% |
| Warningsystems | $12.6M | 2% |
PCH
| Lumber | $131.8M | 42% |
| Timberlands | $52.5M | 17% |
| Rural Real Estate | $51.3M | 16% |
| Residuals And Panels | $34.0M | 11% |
| Pulpwood | $16.7M | 5% |
| Development Real Estate | $14.6M | 5% |
| Other | $8.1M | 3% |
| Other Products | $5.2M | 2% |