vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP (FSS) and RANGE RESOURCES CORP (RRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RANGE RESOURCES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($786.9M vs $597.1M, roughly 1.3× FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP). RANGE RESOURCES CORP runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs 10.2%, a 12.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.5% vs 18.0%). Over the past eight quarters, FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (18.5% CAGR vs 14.6%).
The Federal Signal Company was an American manufacturer of railway signaling equipment in the early 20th century. It was located in Albany, New York.
Range Resources Corporation is a natural gas exploration and production company, the headquartered is in Fort Worth, Texas. It operates in the Marcellus Formation, where it is the largest land owners.
FSS vs RRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $597.1M | $786.9M |
| Net Profit | $60.8M | $179.1M |
| Gross Margin | 28.4% | 94.5% |
| Operating Margin | 14.0% | — |
| Net Margin | 10.2% | 22.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 26.5% | 18.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.6% | 88.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.99 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $597.1M | $786.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $555.0M | $655.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $564.6M | $699.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.8M | $846.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $472.0M | $667.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.2M | $567.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $490.4M | $513.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $424.9M | $598.8M |
| Q4 25 | $60.8M | $179.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.1M | $144.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.4M | $237.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.3M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.0M | $94.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.9M | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.8M | $28.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $92.1M |
| Q4 25 | 28.4% | 94.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | 92.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.0% | 95.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.2% | 93.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.1% | 93.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | 94.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.4% | 93.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.3% | 94.7% |
| Q4 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.2% | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.3% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.1% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.99 | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.11 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.16 | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.75 | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.80 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.87 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.99 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.84 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.7M | $204.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $564.6M | $1.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $7.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.41× | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $204.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.4M | $175.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.7M | $134.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.5M | $344.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $91.1M | $304.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.7M | $277.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.6M | $251.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.9M | $343.1M |
| Q4 25 | $564.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $258.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $266.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $223.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $248.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $266.8M | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.41× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.15× | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.20× | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.17× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.19× | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.23× | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.26× | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $97.2M | $257.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $89.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.60× | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $227.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $97.2M | $257.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.1M | $247.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.7M | $336.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.7M | $330.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $217.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.8M | $245.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.6M | $148.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.3M | $331.9M |
| Q4 25 | $89.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.60× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.90× | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.84× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.79× | 3.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | 2.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.28× | 4.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.67× | 5.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.61× | 3.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FSS
| Vehiclesandequipment | $403.4M | 68% |
| Parts | $66.8M | 11% |
| Publicsafetyandsecurityequipment | $62.2M | 10% |
| Rentalincome | $19.0M | 3% |
| Industrialsignalingequipment | $18.2M | 3% |
| Other | $14.9M | 2% |
| Warningsystems | $12.6M | 2% |
RRC
| Natural Gas Natural Gas Liquids And Oil Sales | $745.5M | 95% |
| Brokered Natural Gas And Marketing | $41.3M | 5% |
