vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $451.0M, roughly 1.2× Frontdoor, Inc.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 9.1%, a 20.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Frontdoor, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs -8.8%).
Frontdoor, Inc. operates a leading U.S.-focused home services and protection platform. It offers customizable home warranty plans covering repairs and replacements for household appliances, HVAC, plumbing, and electrical systems, plus on-demand access to a network of pre-vetted local service professionals for residential maintenance and repairs.
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
FTDR vs KIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $451.0M | $558.0M |
| Net Profit | $41.0M | $166.3M |
| Gross Margin | 55.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 37.2% |
| Net Margin | 9.1% | 29.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | 4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.8% | 23.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.57 | $0.46 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $451.0M | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $432.0M | $542.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $618.0M | $535.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $617.0M | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $426.0M | $536.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.0M | $525.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $540.0M | $507.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $542.0M | $500.2M |
| Q1 26 | $41.0M | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0M | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.0M | $137.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.0M | $163.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $132.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | $166.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.0M | $136.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.0M | $119.7M |
| Q1 26 | 55.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 49.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 36.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.0% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.3% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.8% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.9% | 32.1% |
| Q1 26 | 9.1% | 29.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.2% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.0% | 23.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.57 | $0.46 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.42 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.48 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.30 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.18 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $603.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $230.0M | $10.4B |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $19.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 5.07× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $603.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.0M | $211.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $563.0M | $159.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $562.0M | $226.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $506.0M | $131.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.0M | $688.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $375.0M | $789.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $419.0M | $126.4M |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $565.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $569.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $230.0M | $10.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $242.0M | $10.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $316.0M | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $254.0M | $10.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $198.0M | $10.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.0M | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $261.0M | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $214.0M | $10.6B |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | $19.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $19.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $19.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $19.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $19.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $20.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $19.5B |
| Q1 26 | 5.07× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.73× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.64× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.56× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.88× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.90× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.66× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $114.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 25.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $387.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $101.0M | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.0M | $332.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.0M | $305.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.0M | $223.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.0M | $239.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.0M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.0M | $294.1M |
| Q1 26 | $114.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $95.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.0M | $205.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.5% | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 101.00× | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.60× | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.14× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.35× | 1.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.44× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.25× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.12× | 2.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FTDR
Segment breakdown not available.
KIM
| Revenues from rental properties, net | $552.8M | 99% |
| Management and other fee income | $5.2M | 1% |
