vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Frontdoor, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($451.0M vs $245.3M, roughly 1.8× Tecnoglass Inc.). Tecnoglass Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.6% vs 9.1%, a 1.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Frontdoor, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs 2.4%). Frontdoor, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($114.0M vs $11.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs -8.8%).
Frontdoor, Inc. operates a leading U.S.-focused home services and protection platform. It offers customizable home warranty plans covering repairs and replacements for household appliances, HVAC, plumbing, and electrical systems, plus on-demand access to a network of pre-vetted local service professionals for residential maintenance and repairs.
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
FTDR vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $451.0M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $41.0M | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | 55.0% | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | 9.1% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.8% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.57 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $451.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $432.0M | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $618.0M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $617.0M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $426.0M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.0M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $540.0M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $542.0M | $219.7M |
| Q1 26 | $41.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0M | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.0M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.0M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.0M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.0M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | 55.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 49.3% | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.1% | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.7% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.2% | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.0% | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.7% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.5% | 40.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.0% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.3% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.8% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.9% | 23.3% |
| Q1 26 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.2% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.0% | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.57 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.42 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.48 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.10 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.30 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.18 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $603.0M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $230.0M | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 5.07× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $603.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.0M | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $563.0M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $562.0M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $506.0M | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.0M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $375.0M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $419.0M | $129.5M |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $565.0M | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $569.0M | $144.7M |
| Q1 26 | $230.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $242.0M | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $316.0M | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $254.0M | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $198.0M | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.0M | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $261.0M | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $214.0M | $574.8M |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $942.5M |
| Q1 26 | 5.07× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.73× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.64× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.56× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.88× | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.90× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.16× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.66× | 0.25× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $114.0M | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 25.3% | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $387.0M | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $101.0M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.0M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.0M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.0M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.0M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.0M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.0M | $34.5M |
| Q1 26 | $114.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $95.0M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.0M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.0M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.0M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.0M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.0M | $14.2M |
| Q1 26 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 9.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 101.00× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.60× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.14× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.35× | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.44× | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.25× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.12× | 0.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FTDR
Segment breakdown not available.
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
