vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and KOHLS Corp (KSS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

KOHLS Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.6B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.4× TechnipFMC plc). TechnipFMC plc runs the higher net margin — 9.6% vs 0.2%, a 9.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TechnipFMC plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs -3.6%). TechnipFMC plc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($359.1M vs $16.0M). Over the past eight quarters, TechnipFMC plc's revenue compounded faster (11.0% CAGR vs -22.5%).

TechnipFMC plc is a French-American, UK-domiciled global oil and gas company that provides services for the energy industry. The company was formed by the merger of FMC Technologies of the United States and Technip of France that was announced in 2016 and completed in 2017.

Kohl's Corporation is an American department store retail chain. It currently has 1,174 locations, operating stores in every U.S. state except Hawaii. The company was founded by Polish immigrant Maxwell Kohl, who opened a corner grocery store in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, in 1927. It went on to become a successful chain in the local area, and in 1962 the company branched out by opening its first department store. British American Tobacco Company took a controlling interest in the company in 1972 w...

FTI vs KSS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KSS
KSS
1.4× larger
KSS
$3.6B
$2.5B
FTI
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FTI
FTI
+10.0% gap
FTI
6.3%
-3.6%
KSS
Higher net margin
FTI
FTI
9.4% more per $
FTI
9.6%
0.2%
KSS
More free cash flow
FTI
FTI
$343.1M more FCF
FTI
$359.1M
$16.0M
KSS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FTI
FTI
Annualised
FTI
11.0%
-22.5%
KSS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Revenue
$2.5B
$3.6B
Net Profit
$242.7M
$8.0M
Gross Margin
42.4%
Operating Margin
12.6%
2.0%
Net Margin
9.6%
0.2%
Revenue YoY
6.3%
-3.6%
Net Profit YoY
8.0%
-63.6%
EPS (diluted)
$0.58
$0.07

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Q4 25
$2.5B
$3.6B
Q3 25
$2.6B
$3.5B
Q2 25
$2.5B
$3.2B
Q1 25
$2.2B
$5.4B
Q4 24
$2.4B
$3.7B
Q3 24
$2.3B
$3.7B
Q2 24
$2.3B
$3.4B
Q1 24
$2.0B
$6.0B
Net Profit
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Q4 25
$242.7M
$8.0M
Q3 25
$309.7M
$153.0M
Q2 25
$269.5M
$-15.0M
Q1 25
$142.0M
$48.0M
Q4 24
$224.7M
$22.0M
Q3 24
$274.6M
$66.0M
Q2 24
$186.5M
$-27.0M
Q1 24
$157.1M
$186.0M
Gross Margin
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Q4 25
42.4%
Q3 25
43.3%
Q2 25
23.1%
43.3%
Q1 25
20.5%
35.6%
Q4 24
42.4%
Q3 24
43.0%
Q2 24
21.2%
43.1%
Q1 24
16.4%
35.2%
Operating Margin
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Q4 25
12.6%
2.0%
Q3 25
16.5%
7.9%
Q2 25
15.9%
1.9%
Q1 25
12.5%
2.3%
Q4 24
11.3%
2.6%
Q3 24
13.7%
4.4%
Q2 24
13.3%
1.3%
Q1 24
12.7%
5.0%
Net Margin
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Q4 25
9.6%
0.2%
Q3 25
11.7%
4.3%
Q2 25
10.6%
-0.5%
Q1 25
6.4%
0.9%
Q4 24
9.5%
0.6%
Q3 24
11.7%
1.8%
Q2 24
8.0%
-0.8%
Q1 24
7.7%
3.1%
EPS (diluted)
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Q4 25
$0.58
$0.07
Q3 25
$0.75
$1.35
Q2 25
$0.64
$-0.13
Q1 25
$0.33
$0.43
Q4 24
$0.51
$0.20
Q3 24
$0.63
$0.59
Q2 24
$0.42
$-0.24
Q1 24
$0.35
$1.67

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.0B
$144.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$430.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.4B
$3.9B
Total Assets
$10.1B
$14.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.13×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Q4 25
$1.0B
$144.0M
Q3 25
$876.6M
$174.0M
Q2 25
$950.0M
$153.0M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$134.0M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$174.0M
Q3 24
$231.0M
Q2 24
$228.0M
Q1 24
$183.0M
Total Debt
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Q4 25
$430.0M
Q3 25
$438.0M
Q2 25
$696.3M
Q1 25
$904.9M
Q4 24
$885.2M
Q3 24
$966.7M
Q2 24
$968.4M
Q1 24
$1.0B
Stockholders' Equity
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Q4 25
$3.4B
$3.9B
Q3 25
$3.3B
$3.9B
Q2 25
$3.3B
$3.8B
Q1 25
$3.1B
$3.8B
Q4 24
$3.1B
$3.8B
Q3 24
$3.3B
$3.8B
Q2 24
$3.0B
$3.8B
Q1 24
$3.0B
$3.9B
Total Assets
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Q4 25
$10.1B
$14.1B
Q3 25
$10.3B
$13.4B
Q2 25
$10.1B
$13.6B
Q1 25
$10.0B
$13.6B
Q4 24
$9.9B
$15.1B
Q3 24
$9.7B
$14.2B
Q2 24
$9.2B
$14.3B
Q1 24
$9.1B
$14.0B
Debt / Equity
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Q4 25
0.13×
Q3 25
0.13×
Q2 25
0.21×
Q1 25
0.29×
Q4 24
0.29×
Q3 24
0.30×
Q2 24
0.33×
Q1 24
0.34×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$453.6M
$124.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$359.1M
$16.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
14.3%
0.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.8%
3.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.87×
15.50×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.4B
$819.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Q4 25
$453.6M
$124.0M
Q3 25
$525.1M
$598.0M
Q2 25
$344.2M
$-92.0M
Q1 25
$441.7M
$596.0M
Q4 24
$578.9M
$-195.0M
Q3 24
$277.9M
$254.0M
Q2 24
$230.9M
$-7.0M
Q1 24
$-126.7M
$789.0M
Free Cash Flow
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Q4 25
$359.1M
$16.0M
Q3 25
$447.8M
$508.0M
Q2 25
$260.6M
$-202.0M
Q1 25
$379.9M
$497.0M
Q4 24
$452.7M
$-323.0M
Q3 24
$225.3M
$141.0M
Q2 24
$180.1M
$-133.0M
Q1 24
$-178.7M
$707.0M
FCF Margin
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Q4 25
14.3%
0.4%
Q3 25
16.9%
14.3%
Q2 25
10.3%
-6.2%
Q1 25
17.0%
9.2%
Q4 24
19.1%
-8.7%
Q3 24
9.6%
3.8%
Q2 24
7.7%
-3.9%
Q1 24
-8.8%
11.9%
Capex Intensity
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Q4 25
3.8%
3.0%
Q3 25
2.9%
2.5%
Q2 25
3.3%
3.4%
Q1 25
2.8%
1.8%
Q4 24
5.3%
3.5%
Q3 24
2.2%
3.0%
Q2 24
2.2%
3.7%
Q1 24
2.5%
1.4%
Cash Conversion
FTI
FTI
KSS
KSS
Q4 25
1.87×
15.50×
Q3 25
1.70×
3.91×
Q2 25
1.28×
Q1 25
3.11×
12.42×
Q4 24
2.58×
-8.86×
Q3 24
1.01×
3.85×
Q2 24
1.24×
Q1 24
-0.81×
4.24×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FTI
FTI

Services$1.3B52%
Products$1.1B44%
Other$55.1M2%
Surface Technologies$22.4M1%

KSS
KSS

Products$3.4B95%
Other$168.0M5%
Gift Card$17.0M0%

Related Comparisons