vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. (FTLF) and Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.9M vs $25.9M, roughly 1.0× FITLIFE BRANDS, INC.). FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs -112.0%, a 118.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (72.6% vs 38.4%). FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($239.0K vs $-56.2M). Over the past eight quarters, FITLIFE BRANDS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.1% CAGR vs -16.3%).
FitLife Brands, Inc. is a health and wellness firm developing, marketing and distributing premium nutritional supplements, sports nutrition products and weight management solutions. It serves North American fitness enthusiasts, athletes and health-focused consumers via retail and e-commerce channels.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
FTLF vs GPUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.9M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | $-30.1M |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | -117.8% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | -112.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 72.6% | 38.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -20.8% | -6670.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.9M | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.5M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.1M | $25.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.0M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5M | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | $-30.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $921.0K | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $-445.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $-33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | 34.5% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.2% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.8% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | -21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.0% | 47.4% |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | -117.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | -57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | -39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | -25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | -46.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | -79.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.7% | -151.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | -112.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | -53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.7% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.3% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | -190.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.1% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $-2.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.22 | $-8.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | $-24.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.27 | $-37.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.21 | $3.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $13.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $83.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $43.6M | $119.8M |
| Total Assets | $106.3M | $313.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.5M | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $88.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1M | $96.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $104.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5M | $30.0M |
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | $119.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.9M | $55.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.9M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.1M | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.4M | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | $106.3M | $313.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.0M | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.8M | $213.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.2M | $218.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.5M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $231.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.3M | $270.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.5M | $299.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | 11.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | 0.51× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $244.0K | $-37.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $239.0K | $-56.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.9% | -208.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 68.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.15× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.4M | $-87.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $244.0K | $-37.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $957.0K | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $-10.2M |
| Q4 25 | $239.0K | $-56.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $-11.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | -84.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | -27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -47.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -33.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.4% | -30.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 68.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.33× | -2.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FTLF
| US | $24.3M | 94% |
| Other | $1.7M | 6% |
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
