vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. (FTLF) and Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.9M vs $14.6M, roughly 1.8× Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs 6.3%, a 57.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs 72.6%). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.2M vs $239.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.2% CAGR vs 25.1%).
FitLife Brands, Inc. is a health and wellness firm developing, marketing and distributing premium nutritional supplements, sports nutrition products and weight management solutions. It serves North American fitness enthusiasts, athletes and health-focused consumers via retail and e-commerce channels.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
FTLF vs IDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.9M | $14.6M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | $9.4M |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 68.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 62.4% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 64.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 72.6% | 92.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -20.8% | 220.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.9M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.5M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.1M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.0M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9M | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5M | $5.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $921.0K | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | 34.5% | 68.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.2% | 63.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.8% | 57.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | 53.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | 48.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | 50.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.0% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 62.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.7% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | 36.3% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 64.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.7% | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.3% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.1% | 36.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.20 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.22 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.27 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.21 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $43.6M | $108.2M |
| Total Assets | $106.3M | $116.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.5M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1M | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | $108.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.9M | $74.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.9M | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | $39.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.1M | $37.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $25.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.4M | $21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $106.3M | $116.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.0M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.8M | $57.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.2M | $48.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.5M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.3M | $32.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.5M | $28.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | 0.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $244.0K | $10.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $239.0K | $8.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.9% | 56.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 17.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.15× | 1.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.4M | $12.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $244.0K | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $957.0K | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $239.0K | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $709.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 56.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 13.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.4% | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.15× | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.99× | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.68× | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.15× | 1.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.46× | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.96× | 1.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.60× | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.33× | 1.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FTLF
| US | $24.3M | 94% |
| Other | $1.7M | 6% |
IDR
Segment breakdown not available.