vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. (FTLF) and Outdoor Holding Co (POWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.9M vs $13.4M, roughly 1.9× Outdoor Holding Co). Outdoor Holding Co runs the higher net margin — 16.7% vs 6.3%, a 10.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (72.6% vs -54.1%). Outdoor Holding Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($5.0M vs $239.0K).
FitLife Brands, Inc. is a health and wellness firm developing, marketing and distributing premium nutritional supplements, sports nutrition products and weight management solutions. It serves North American fitness enthusiasts, athletes and health-focused consumers via retail and e-commerce channels.
Vista Outdoor Inc. was an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer that operated in two segments: shooting sports and outdoor products. It was a "house of brands" with more than 40 labels and subsidiaries.
FTLF vs POWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.9M | $13.4M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 87.1% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 14.7% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 16.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 72.6% | -54.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -20.8% | 108.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.9M | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.5M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.1M | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $12.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.0M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5M | $-50.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $921.0K | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $-77.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $-26.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $-5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 34.5% | 87.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.2% | 87.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.8% | 87.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | 87.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | 87.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | 86.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | 85.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | -50.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | -213.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | -163.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | -50.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.7% | -50.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | -54.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.7% | -614.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.3% | -103.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | -120.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.1% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.20 | $-0.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.22 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.27 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.21 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $69.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $43.6M | $237.3M |
| Total Assets | $106.3M | $271.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $69.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $65.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $63.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $50.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | $237.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.9M | $235.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.9M | $222.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | $222.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.1M | $299.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $325.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $342.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.4M | $358.0M |
| Q4 25 | $106.3M | $271.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.0M | $270.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.8M | $269.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.2M | $297.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.5M | $355.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $368.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.3M | $398.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.5M | $403.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $244.0K | $5.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $239.0K | $5.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.9% | 37.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.15× | 2.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.4M | $-2.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $244.0K | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $957.0K | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-547.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $4.3M |
| Q4 25 | $239.0K | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $720.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | -63.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | -18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -88.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.4% | -2.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | -5.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.15× | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.99× | 2.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.33× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FTLF
| US | $24.3M | 94% |
| Other | $1.7M | 6% |
POWW
Segment breakdown not available.