vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fortive (FTV) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.0× Fortive). Fortive runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs 5.0%, a 7.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fortive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.7% vs -2.5%). Fortive produced more free cash flow last quarter ($193.8M vs $66.2M). Over the past eight quarters, CHART INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs -17.0%).
Fortive Corporation is an American industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington. The company specializes in providing essential technologies for connected workflow solutions; designing, developing, manufacturing and distributing professional and engineered products, software and services. Their products and services are split into three strategic segments; Intelligent Operating Solutions, Precision Technologies, and Advanced Healthcare Solutions. As of Decem...
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
FTV vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $136.4M | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | 63.2% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 17.9% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 12.8% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.7% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.1% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $136.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $185.7M | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.0M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.6M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.9M | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.8M | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.6M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.1M | $58.6M |
| Q1 26 | 63.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 63.2% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.2% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.0% | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.8% | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.3% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.0% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.8% | 33.8% |
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.5% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.3% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.60 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.16 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.49 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.50 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.60 | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.63 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.55 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $356.1M | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.5B | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.1B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $11.6B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $356.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $375.5M | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.8M | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $892.1M | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $813.3M | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.3M | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.1M | $247.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $11.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.7B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3B | $9.3B |
| Q1 26 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.50× | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.36× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $234.8M | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $193.8M | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.1% | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.72× | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $935.2M | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $234.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.4M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.2M | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.7M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $502.2M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $459.0M | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.9M | $116.1M |
| Q1 26 | $193.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $313.8M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $153.1M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.5M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.0M | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $465.2M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.2M | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.7M | $88.0M |
| Q1 26 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.6% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.7% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.1% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.83× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.41× | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.41× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.07× | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.58× | 1.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FTV
Segment breakdown not available.
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
