vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fortive (FTV) and Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fortive is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $235.9M, roughly 4.5× Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.). Fortive runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs 3.4%, a 9.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.4% vs 7.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-13.8% CAGR vs -17.0%).
Fortive Corporation is an American industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington. The company specializes in providing essential technologies for connected workflow solutions; designing, developing, manufacturing and distributing professional and engineered products, software and services. Their products and services are split into three strategic segments; Intelligent Operating Solutions, Precision Technologies, and Advanced Healthcare Solutions. As of Decem...
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc., formerly the Howard Hughes Corporation, is a real estate development and management company based in The Woodlands, Texas. It was formed in 2010 as a spin-off from General Growth Properties (GGP). Most of its holdings are focused on several master-planned communities. It took its name from the original Howard Hughes Corporation, which had developed the planned community of Summerlin, Nevada, and later became a subsidiary of GGP.
FTV vs HHH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $235.9M |
| Net Profit | $136.4M | $8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 63.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.9% | 121.6% |
| Net Margin | 12.8% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.7% | 18.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.1% | -25.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | $235.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $624.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $390.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $260.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $935.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $327.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $317.4M |
| Q1 26 | $136.4M | $8.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $185.7M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.0M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.6M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.9M | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.8M | $156.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.6M | $72.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.1M | $21.1M |
| Q1 26 | 63.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 63.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | 121.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.5% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.3% | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 20.4% |
| Q1 26 | 12.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | -4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.60 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.16 | $2.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.49 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.50 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.60 | $3.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.63 | $1.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.55 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $356.1M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.1B | $3.8B |
| Total Assets | $11.6B | $11.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $356.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $375.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $892.1M | $493.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $813.3M | $596.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.3M | $400.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.1M | $436.8M |
| Q1 26 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5B | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | $11.6B | $11.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.7B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $10.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2B | $10.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $9.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3B | $9.9B |
| Q1 26 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.50× | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.36× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $234.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.72× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $234.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $360.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.4M | $149.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.2M | $177.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.7M | $-224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $502.2M | $337.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $459.0M | $248.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.9M | $-17.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $313.8M | $348.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $153.1M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.5M | $169.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.0M | $-238.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $465.2M | $317.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.2M | $238.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.7M | $-25.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 35.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | 65.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.6% | -119.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.7% | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.1% | 73.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | -7.9% |
| Q1 26 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.83× | 60.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.99× | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.41× | -21.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.41× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.07× | 3.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.58× | -0.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FTV
Segment breakdown not available.
HHH
| Rental revenue | $113.5M | 48% |
| Master Planned Communities land sales | $99.6M | 42% |
| Other revenues | $11.0M | 5% |
| Builder price participation | $8.7M | 4% |
| Condominium rights and unit sales | $3.1M | 1% |
