vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fortive (FTV) and MERCURY GENERAL CORP (MCY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MERCURY GENERAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.5× Fortive). MERCURY GENERAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 13.2% vs 5.4%, a 7.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MERCURY GENERAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.4% vs -33.1%). MERCURY GENERAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($273.9M vs $153.1M). Over the past eight quarters, MERCURY GENERAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs -19.5%).
Fortive Corporation is an American industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington. The company specializes in providing essential technologies for connected workflow solutions; designing, developing, manufacturing and distributing professional and engineered products, software and services. Their products and services are split into three strategic segments; Intelligent Operating Solutions, Precision Technologies, and Advanced Healthcare Solutions. As of Decem...
Mercury General Corporation is a multiple-line insurance organization that offers personal automobiles, homeowners, renters, and business insurance. Mercury's primary focus is automobiles and homeowners' insurance.
FTV vs MCY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $55.0M | $202.5M |
| Gross Margin | 63.2% | 99.7% |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | 16.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.4% | 13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -33.1% | 12.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -75.2% | 100.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | $3.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $202.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.0M | $280.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.6M | $166.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.9M | $-108.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.8M | $101.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.6M | $230.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.1M | $62.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $207.4M | $73.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 99.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.2% | 99.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.0% | 99.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.8% | 99.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.3% | 99.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.0% | 99.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.8% | 99.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.3% | 99.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.5% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.3% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | -7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 15.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.6% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.16 | $5.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.49 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.50 | $-1.96 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.60 | $1.82 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.63 | $4.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.55 | $1.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.58 | $1.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $430.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.3B | $575.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.5B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $9.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.51× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $892.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $813.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $704.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $575.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $575.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $9.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $9.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0B | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3B | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5B | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.38× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $164.4M | $287.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $153.1M | $273.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.9% | 17.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.99× | 1.42× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.1B | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $287.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.4M | $496.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.2M | $371.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.7M | $-68.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $502.2M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $459.0M | $318.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.9M | $278.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $256.7M | $192.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $273.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $153.1M | $479.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.5M | $357.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.0M | $-81.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $465.2M | $236.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.2M | $306.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.7M | $266.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $230.3M | $182.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.6% | -5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.7% | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.1% | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.1% | 14.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.99× | 1.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | 2.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.41× | 2.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.07× | 1.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.58× | 4.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.24× | 2.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FTV
| Advanced Healthcare Solutions | $328.3M | 32% |
| Industrial Manufacturing | $287.9M | 28% |
| Energy And Infrastructure | $166.7M | 16% |
| Government | $88.0M | 9% |
| Retail | $82.7M | 8% |
| Other Direct End Markets | $79.6M | 8% |
MCY
Segment breakdown not available.
