vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fortive (FTV) and Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sensata Technologies Holding plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($917.9M vs $139.0M, roughly 6.6× Fortive). Fortive runs the higher net margin — 133.6% vs 6.9%, a 126.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sensata Technologies Holding plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.1% vs -91.4%). Fortive produced more free cash flow last quarter ($335.5M vs $151.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Sensata Technologies Holding plc's revenue compounded faster (-4.5% CAGR vs -69.8%).
Fortive Corporation is an American industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington. The company specializes in providing essential technologies for connected workflow solutions; designing, developing, manufacturing and distributing professional and engineered products, software and services. Their products and services are split into three strategic segments; Intelligent Operating Solutions, Precision Technologies, and Advanced Healthcare Solutions. As of Decem...
Sensata Technologies Holding plc is a global industrial technology company that designs, manufactures and sells a broad portfolio of sensing, electrical protection and control solutions. Its products serve automotive, industrial, aerospace, HVAC, telecommunications and heavy vehicle end markets, catering to manufacturing and enterprise clients across the world.
FTV vs ST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $139.0M | $917.9M |
| Net Profit | $185.7M | $63.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 29.0% |
| Operating Margin | 75.4% | 10.9% |
| Net Margin | 133.6% | 6.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -91.4% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -11.1% | 992.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.58 | $0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $139.0M | $917.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $932.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $943.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $911.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $907.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $982.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $185.7M | $63.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.0M | $-162.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.6M | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.9M | $69.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.8M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.6M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.1M | $71.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $207.4M | $76.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.2% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.0% | 30.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.8% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.3% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.0% | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.8% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.3% | 31.5% |
| Q4 25 | 75.4% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.5% | -13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.3% | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | 14.4% |
| Q4 25 | 133.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | -17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | -2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.6% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.58 | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.16 | $-1.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.49 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.50 | $0.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.60 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.63 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.55 | $0.47 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.58 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $375.5M | $573.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $2.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.5B | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $11.7B | $6.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.50× | 1.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $375.5M | $573.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.8M | $791.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $661.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $892.1M | $588.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $813.3M | $593.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.3M | $506.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $704.6M | $460.4M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5B | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | $11.7B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5B | $7.6B |
| Q4 25 | 0.50× | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.38× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $365.9M | $201.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $335.5M | $151.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 241.4% | 16.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 21.9% | 5.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.97× | 3.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $978.1M | $490.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $365.9M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.4M | $159.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.2M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.7M | $119.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $502.2M | $170.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $459.0M | $130.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.9M | $143.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $256.7M | $106.5M |
| Q4 25 | $335.5M | $151.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $153.1M | $136.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.5M | $115.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.0M | $86.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $465.2M | $138.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.2M | $91.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.7M | $98.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $230.3M | $64.4M |
| Q4 25 | 241.4% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.7% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.1% | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | 21.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.97× | 3.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.41× | 1.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.41× | 29.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.07× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.58× | 2.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.24× | 1.40× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FTV
| Services | $137.9M | 99% |
| Products | $1.1M | 1% |
ST
Segment breakdown not available.
