vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of FULTON FINANCIAL CORP (FULT) and RAMBUS INC (RMBS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

FULTON FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.2M vs $180.2M, roughly 1.9× RAMBUS INC). RAMBUS INC runs the higher net margin — 33.2% vs 28.2%, a 5.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RAMBUS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs 4.2%). Over the past eight quarters, RAMBUS INC's revenue compounded faster (16.8% CAGR vs 0.2%).

Fulton Financial Corporation is an American regional financial services holding company, headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

Rambus Inc. is an American technology company that designs, develops and licenses chip interface technologies and architectures that are used in digital electronics products. The company, founded in 1990, is well known for inventing RDRAM and for its intellectual property-based litigation following the introduction of DDR-SDRAM memory.

FULT vs RMBS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FULT
FULT
1.9× larger
FULT
$336.2M
$180.2M
RMBS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
RMBS
RMBS
+3.9% gap
RMBS
8.1%
4.2%
FULT
Higher net margin
RMBS
RMBS
5.1% more per $
RMBS
33.2%
28.2%
FULT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
RMBS
RMBS
Annualised
RMBS
16.8%
0.2%
FULT

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
FULT
FULT
RMBS
RMBS
Revenue
$336.2M
$180.2M
Net Profit
$94.8M
$59.9M
Gross Margin
79.7%
Operating Margin
34.3%
Net Margin
28.2%
33.2%
Revenue YoY
4.2%
8.1%
Net Profit YoY
1.9%
-7.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.55
$0.55

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FULT
FULT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
$336.2M
$180.2M
Q4 25
$336.0M
$190.2M
Q3 25
$334.6M
$178.5M
Q2 25
$324.1M
$172.2M
Q1 25
$318.4M
$166.7M
Q4 24
$319.6M
$161.1M
Q3 24
$317.7M
$145.5M
Q2 24
$334.7M
$132.1M
Net Profit
FULT
FULT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
$94.8M
$59.9M
Q4 25
$99.0M
$63.8M
Q3 25
$100.5M
$48.4M
Q2 25
$99.2M
$57.9M
Q1 25
$93.0M
$60.3M
Q4 24
$68.6M
$62.2M
Q3 24
$63.2M
$48.7M
Q2 24
$95.0M
$36.1M
Gross Margin
FULT
FULT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
79.7%
Q4 25
78.9%
Q3 25
79.5%
Q2 25
79.8%
Q1 25
80.3%
Q4 24
80.4%
Q3 24
80.7%
Q2 24
79.7%
Operating Margin
FULT
FULT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
34.3%
Q4 25
35.7%
37.2%
Q3 25
38.2%
35.4%
Q2 25
37.8%
36.6%
Q1 25
36.1%
37.9%
Q4 24
27.0%
35.9%
Q3 24
25.1%
37.6%
Q2 24
30.8%
30.5%
Net Margin
FULT
FULT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
28.2%
33.2%
Q4 25
29.5%
33.6%
Q3 25
30.0%
27.1%
Q2 25
30.6%
33.6%
Q1 25
29.2%
36.2%
Q4 24
21.5%
38.6%
Q3 24
19.9%
33.4%
Q2 24
28.4%
27.3%
EPS (diluted)
FULT
FULT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
$0.55
$0.55
Q4 25
$0.53
$0.58
Q3 25
$0.53
$0.44
Q2 25
$0.53
$0.53
Q1 25
$0.49
$0.56
Q4 24
$0.36
$0.57
Q3 24
$0.33
$0.45
Q2 24
$0.52
$0.33

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FULT
FULT
RMBS
RMBS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$134.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.5B
Total Assets
$32.2B
$1.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FULT
FULT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
$134.3M
Q4 25
$182.8M
Q3 25
$79.2M
Q2 25
$87.8M
Q1 25
$132.2M
Q4 24
$99.8M
Q3 24
$114.0M
Q2 24
$124.6M
Stockholders' Equity
FULT
FULT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
$3.5B
Q4 25
$3.5B
$1.4B
Q3 25
$3.4B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$3.3B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$3.3B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$3.2B
$1.1B
Q3 24
$3.2B
$1.0B
Q2 24
$3.1B
$1.0B
Total Assets
FULT
FULT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
$32.2B
$1.5B
Q4 25
$32.1B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$32.0B
$1.4B
Q2 25
$32.0B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$32.1B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$32.1B
$1.3B
Q3 24
$32.2B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$31.8B
$1.3B

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FULT
FULT

Segment breakdown not available.

RMBS
RMBS

Product revenue$88.0M49%
Royalties$69.6M39%
Contract and other revenue$22.6M13%

Related Comparisons