vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of FULTON FINANCIAL CORP (FULT) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

FULTON FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.2M vs $245.3M, roughly 1.4× Tecnoglass Inc.). FULTON FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 28.2% vs 10.6%, a 17.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FULTON FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.2% vs 2.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 0.2%).

Fulton Financial Corporation is an American regional financial services holding company, headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.

FULT vs TGLS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FULT
FULT
1.4× larger
FULT
$336.2M
$245.3M
TGLS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FULT
FULT
+1.8% gap
FULT
4.2%
2.4%
TGLS
Higher net margin
FULT
FULT
17.5% more per $
FULT
28.2%
10.6%
TGLS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TGLS
TGLS
Annualised
TGLS
12.8%
0.2%
FULT

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Revenue
$336.2M
$245.3M
Net Profit
$94.8M
$26.1M
Gross Margin
40.0%
Operating Margin
18.3%
Net Margin
28.2%
10.6%
Revenue YoY
4.2%
2.4%
Net Profit YoY
-4.3%
-44.5%
EPS (diluted)
$0.55
$0.57

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Q1 26
$336.2M
Q4 25
$336.0M
$245.3M
Q3 25
$334.6M
$260.5M
Q2 25
$324.1M
$255.5M
Q1 25
$318.4M
$222.3M
Q4 24
$319.6M
$239.6M
Q3 24
$317.7M
$238.3M
Q2 24
$334.7M
$219.7M
Net Profit
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Q1 26
$94.8M
Q4 25
$99.0M
$26.1M
Q3 25
$100.5M
$47.2M
Q2 25
$99.2M
$44.1M
Q1 25
$93.0M
$42.2M
Q4 24
$68.6M
$47.0M
Q3 24
$63.2M
$49.5M
Q2 24
$95.0M
$35.0M
Gross Margin
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Q1 26
Q4 25
40.0%
Q3 25
42.7%
Q2 25
44.7%
Q1 25
43.9%
Q4 24
44.5%
Q3 24
45.8%
Q2 24
40.8%
Operating Margin
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Q1 26
Q4 25
35.7%
18.3%
Q3 25
38.2%
25.1%
Q2 25
37.8%
24.0%
Q1 25
36.1%
26.7%
Q4 24
27.0%
28.0%
Q3 24
25.1%
28.4%
Q2 24
30.8%
23.3%
Net Margin
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Q1 26
28.2%
Q4 25
29.5%
10.6%
Q3 25
30.0%
18.1%
Q2 25
30.6%
17.3%
Q1 25
29.2%
19.0%
Q4 24
21.5%
19.6%
Q3 24
19.9%
20.8%
Q2 24
28.4%
15.9%
EPS (diluted)
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Q1 26
$0.55
Q4 25
$0.53
$0.57
Q3 25
$0.53
$1.01
Q2 25
$0.53
$0.94
Q1 25
$0.49
$0.90
Q4 24
$0.36
$1.00
Q3 24
$0.33
$1.05
Q2 24
$0.52
$0.75

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$104.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$174.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.5B
$713.1M
Total Assets
$32.2B
$1.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.24×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$104.1M
Q3 25
$127.1M
Q2 25
$140.9M
Q1 25
$160.2M
Q4 24
$137.5M
Q3 24
$124.8M
Q2 24
$129.5M
Total Debt
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$174.4M
Q3 25
$114.7M
Q2 25
$110.6M
Q1 25
$110.6M
Q4 24
$111.1M
Q3 24
$126.8M
Q2 24
$144.7M
Stockholders' Equity
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Q1 26
$3.5B
Q4 25
$3.5B
$713.1M
Q3 25
$3.4B
$764.0M
Q2 25
$3.3B
$736.0M
Q1 25
$3.3B
$685.1M
Q4 24
$3.2B
$631.2M
Q3 24
$3.2B
$613.3M
Q2 24
$3.1B
$574.8M
Total Assets
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Q1 26
$32.2B
Q4 25
$32.1B
$1.3B
Q3 25
$32.0B
$1.2B
Q2 25
$32.0B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$32.1B
$1.1B
Q4 24
$32.1B
$1.0B
Q3 24
$32.2B
$996.3M
Q2 24
$31.8B
$942.5M
Debt / Equity
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.24×
Q3 25
0.15×
Q2 25
0.15×
Q1 25
0.16×
Q4 24
0.18×
Q3 24
0.21×
Q2 24
0.25×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$31.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$11.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
4.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
8.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.19×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$34.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$304.5M
$31.0M
Q3 25
$116.1M
$40.0M
Q2 25
$91.7M
$17.9M
Q1 25
$703.0K
$46.9M
Q4 24
$416.6M
$61.1M
Q3 24
$-22.0M
$41.5M
Q2 24
$157.8M
$34.5M
Free Cash Flow
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$11.4M
Q3 25
$21.2M
Q2 25
$-14.7M
Q1 25
$16.5M
Q4 24
$35.4M
Q3 24
$17.8M
Q2 24
$14.2M
FCF Margin
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.7%
Q3 25
8.2%
Q2 25
-5.7%
Q1 25
7.4%
Q4 24
14.8%
Q3 24
7.5%
Q2 24
6.5%
Capex Intensity
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Q1 26
Q4 25
8.0%
Q3 25
7.2%
Q2 25
12.7%
Q1 25
13.7%
Q4 24
10.7%
Q3 24
9.9%
Q2 24
9.2%
Cash Conversion
FULT
FULT
TGLS
TGLS
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.08×
1.19×
Q3 25
1.16×
0.85×
Q2 25
0.92×
0.41×
Q1 25
0.01×
1.11×
Q4 24
6.07×
1.30×
Q3 24
-0.35×
0.84×
Q2 24
1.66×
0.98×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FULT
FULT

Segment breakdown not available.

TGLS
TGLS

Product Sales$164.2M67%
Fixed Price Contracts$81.1M33%
Related Party$692.0K0%

Related Comparisons