vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FULTON FINANCIAL CORP (FULT) and TRUSTMARK CORP (TRMK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FULTON FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.2M vs $204.1M, roughly 1.6× TRUSTMARK CORP). TRUSTMARK CORP runs the higher net margin — 28.4% vs 28.2%, a 0.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TRUSTMARK CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.5% vs 4.2%). Over the past eight quarters, TRUSTMARK CORP's revenue compounded faster (8.9% CAGR vs 0.2%).
Fulton Financial Corporation is an American regional financial services holding company, headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Trustmark is an insurance company. According to Crain's Chicago Business magazine, Trustmark ranks #69 among Chicago's Largest Privately Held Companies in 2018.
FULT vs TRMK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.2M | $204.1M |
| Net Profit | $94.8M | $57.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 34.7% |
| Net Margin | 28.2% | 28.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 4.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1.9% | 2.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.55 | $0.96 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $336.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.0M | $204.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.6M | $202.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $324.1M | $198.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.4M | $194.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $319.6M | $155.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $317.7M | $192.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $334.7M | $141.0M |
| Q1 26 | $94.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.0M | $57.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.5M | $56.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.2M | $55.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.0M | $53.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.6M | $56.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.0M | $73.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.7% | 34.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.2% | 34.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.8% | 34.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.0% | 41.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.1% | 32.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.8% | -98.1% |
| Q1 26 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.5% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.0% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.6% | 28.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | 36.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 26.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.4% | 52.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.53 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.53 | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.53 | $0.92 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $0.88 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.36 | $0.91 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.33 | $0.84 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $1.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $32.2B | $18.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | $32.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.1B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0B | $18.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.0B | $18.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.1B | $18.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.1B | $18.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.2B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8B | $18.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $243.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $232.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 113.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $409.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $304.5M | $243.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.1M | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $703.0K | $82.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $416.6M | $116.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.0M | $59.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.8M | $16.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $232.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $62.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $80.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $93.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 113.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.08× | 4.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.16× | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.92× | 0.67× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | 1.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.07× | 2.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.35× | 1.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.66× | 0.23× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
