vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FULTON FINANCIAL CORP (FULT) and TRIMAS CORP (TRS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FULTON FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.2M vs $256.5M, roughly 1.3× TRIMAS CORP). TRIMAS CORP runs the higher net margin — 31.9% vs 28.2%, a 3.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FULTON FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.2% vs 3.8%). Over the past eight quarters, TRIMAS CORP's revenue compounded faster (3.3% CAGR vs 0.2%).
Fulton Financial Corporation is an American regional financial services holding company, headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Trimas Corp is a diversified industrial manufacturing enterprise that designs, produces and distributes a wide portfolio of engineered products, including specialized fasteners, aerospace components, custom packaging solutions, and consumer & industrial hardware. It primarily serves aerospace, automotive, construction, consumer goods and industrial sectors, with core operations across North America and selected global markets.
FULT vs TRS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.2M | $256.5M |
| Net Profit | $94.8M | $81.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.7% |
| Net Margin | 28.2% | 31.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 3.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1.9% | 236.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.55 | $2.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $336.2M | $256.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.0M | $-140.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.6M | $269.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $324.1M | $274.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.4M | $241.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $319.6M | $-66.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $317.7M | $229.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $334.7M | $240.5M |
| Q1 26 | $94.8M | $81.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.0M | $81.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.5M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.2M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.0M | $12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.6M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.0M | $10.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.8% | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.8% | 7.4% |
| Q1 26 | 28.2% | 31.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.5% | -58.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | -8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.4% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | $2.03 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.53 | $2.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.53 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.53 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.36 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.33 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $30.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $705.6M |
| Total Assets | $32.2B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $26.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $469.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $407.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $424.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $434.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $398.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $409.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $427.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.5B | $705.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $705.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $725.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $715.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $686.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $667.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $682.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $675.9M |
| Q1 26 | $32.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.63× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $117.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $36.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 14.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 18.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $109.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $117.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $304.5M | $41.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.1M | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $30.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $703.0K | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $416.6M | $27.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.0M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.8M | $18.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $36.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -26.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -18.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 18.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.08× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.16× | 3.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.92× | 1.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.07× | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.35× | 8.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.66× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.