vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FULTON FINANCIAL CORP (FULT) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Verisign is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.3M vs $336.2M, roughly 1.3× FULTON FINANCIAL CORP). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 28.2%, a 20.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Verisign posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs 4.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Verisign's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs 0.2%).
Fulton Financial Corporation is an American regional financial services holding company, headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
FULT vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.2M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $94.8M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 28.2% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1.9% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.55 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $336.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.0M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.6M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $324.1M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.4M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $319.6M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $317.7M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $334.7M | $387.1M |
| Q1 26 | $94.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.0M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.5M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.2M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.0M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.6M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.0M | $198.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.7% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.2% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.8% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.0% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.1% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.8% | 68.8% |
| Q1 26 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.5% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.0% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.6% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.4% | 51.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.53 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.53 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.53 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.36 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $32.2B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $689.9M |
| Q1 26 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $-1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $32.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8B | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $304.5M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.1M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $703.0K | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $416.6M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.0M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.8M | $160.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $151.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.08× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.16× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.92× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.07× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.35× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.66× | 0.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
