vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) and GOLAR LNG LTD (GLNG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($225.6M vs $122.5M, roughly 1.8× GOLAR LNG LTD). GOLAR LNG LTD runs the higher net margin — 25.7% vs -119.0%, a 144.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GOLAR LNG LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (89.1% vs 11.7%).
Six Flags, officially Six Flags Entertainment Corporation, is an American amusement park company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, United States. The company has 42 locations in its portfolio, including 27 amusement parks and 15 water parks, with nine on-site resort properties. Formed on July 1, 2024, following a merger of equals between longtime competitors Cedar Fair and the former Six Flags company, it is the largest regional amusement park operator in the world. Upon completion ...
Golar LNG owns and operates marine LNG infrastructure. The company had developed Floating LNG liquefaction terminal (FLNG) and Floating Storage and Regasification Unit (FSRU) projects based on the conversion of existing LNG carriers. Front End Engineering and Design (FEED) studies have now been completed for a larger newbuild FLNG solution. Golar is also collaborating with another industry leader to investigate solutions for the floating production of blue and green ammonia as well as carbon ...
FUN vs GLNG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $225.6M | $122.5M |
| Net Profit | $-268.6M | $31.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 39.4% |
| Net Margin | -119.0% | 25.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.7% | 89.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -22.2% | 190.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $225.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $122.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $930.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $64.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $571.6M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $67.3M |
| Q1 26 | $-268.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-92.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2B | $31.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-99.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-219.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $111.0M | $-34.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $92.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 91.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 91.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 91.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 89.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 91.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 90.7% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -83.7% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -158.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.5% | -43.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | -119.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -14.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -90.1% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -108.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.2% | -53.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 137.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.93 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.77 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.99 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.20 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.10 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.5M | $611.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $279.2M | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $7.7B | $4.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $116.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $91.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.7M | $611.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.7M | $732.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.9M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $727.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $279.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $549.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $614.3M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.16× | 1.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.97× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.95× | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 0.55× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $149.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-37.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $356.2M | $149.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $187.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-178.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $337.4M | $62.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-109.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $256.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-318.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -16.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -157.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 69.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.04× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FUN
| In-park admissions revenues | $113.4M | 50% |
| In-park product revenues | $89.0M | 39% |
| Out-of-park revenues | $28.8M | 13% |
GLNG
Segment breakdown not available.
