vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of FIRST US BANCSHARES, INC. (FUSB) and Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. (GLUE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.8M vs $10.4M, roughly 1.2× FIRST US BANCSHARES, INC.). FIRST US BANCSHARES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 20.4% vs -212.1%, a 232.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.5% vs 7.1%). Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($99.8M vs $9.1M).

First Citizens Bancshares, Inc. is a bank holding company based in Raleigh, North Carolina and one of the largest banks in the United States. Its primary subsidiary is First Citizens Bank, which operates over 500 branches in 23 states. A second subsidiary is Silicon Valley Bank, which operates 39 offices in 15 states.

Monte Rosa Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company specializing in the discovery and development of targeted molecular glue degrader therapies. Its pipeline addresses unmet medical needs across oncology, rare genetic disorders and immunological diseases, with operations focused on advancing novel treatments for global patient populations.

FUSB vs GLUE — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GLUE
GLUE
1.2× larger
GLUE
$12.8M
$10.4M
FUSB
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GLUE
GLUE
+31.5% gap
GLUE
38.5%
7.1%
FUSB
Higher net margin
FUSB
FUSB
232.5% more per $
FUSB
20.4%
-212.1%
GLUE
More free cash flow
GLUE
GLUE
$90.7M more FCF
GLUE
$99.8M
$9.1M
FUSB

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
FUSB
FUSB
GLUE
GLUE
Revenue
$10.4M
$12.8M
Net Profit
$2.1M
$-27.1M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
28.1%
-258.3%
Net Margin
20.4%
-212.1%
Revenue YoY
7.1%
38.5%
Net Profit YoY
24.2%
-13.5%
EPS (diluted)
$0.36

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FUSB
FUSB
GLUE
GLUE
Q4 25
$10.4M
Q3 25
$10.5M
$12.8M
Q2 25
$10.3M
$23.2M
Q1 25
$9.8M
$84.9M
Q4 24
$9.7M
$60.6M
Q3 24
$10.1M
Q2 24
$10.0M
Q1 24
$9.9M
Net Profit
FUSB
FUSB
GLUE
GLUE
Q4 25
$2.1M
Q3 25
$1.9M
$-27.1M
Q2 25
$155.0K
$-12.3M
Q1 25
$1.8M
$46.9M
Q4 24
$1.7M
$13.4M
Q3 24
$2.2M
Q2 24
$2.1M
Q1 24
$2.1M
Operating Margin
FUSB
FUSB
GLUE
GLUE
Q4 25
28.1%
Q3 25
23.9%
-258.3%
Q2 25
1.6%
-67.1%
Q1 25
23.8%
51.9%
Q4 24
23.8%
21.4%
Q3 24
29.2%
Q2 24
27.4%
Q1 24
27.8%
Net Margin
FUSB
FUSB
GLUE
GLUE
Q4 25
20.4%
Q3 25
18.4%
-212.1%
Q2 25
1.5%
-53.0%
Q1 25
18.1%
55.2%
Q4 24
17.6%
22.2%
Q3 24
22.0%
Q2 24
21.2%
Q1 24
21.3%
EPS (diluted)
FUSB
FUSB
GLUE
GLUE
Q4 25
$0.36
Q3 25
$0.32
Q2 25
$0.03
Q1 25
$0.29
Q4 24
$0.29
Q3 24
$0.36
Q2 24
$0.34
Q1 24
$0.34

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FUSB
FUSB
GLUE
GLUE
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$73.5M
$208.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$10.9M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$105.6M
$245.8M
Total Assets
$1.2B
$459.8M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.10×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FUSB
FUSB
GLUE
GLUE
Q4 25
$73.5M
Q3 25
$54.7M
$208.3M
Q2 25
$54.0M
$69.4M
Q1 25
$56.0M
$78.5M
Q4 24
$47.2M
$224.3M
Q3 24
$82.3M
Q2 24
$58.2M
Q1 24
$60.2M
Total Debt
FUSB
FUSB
GLUE
GLUE
Q4 25
$10.9M
Q3 25
$10.9M
Q2 25
$10.9M
Q1 25
$10.9M
Q4 24
$10.9M
Q3 24
$10.9M
Q2 24
$10.8M
Q1 24
$10.8M
Stockholders' Equity
FUSB
FUSB
GLUE
GLUE
Q4 25
$105.6M
Q3 25
$104.2M
$245.8M
Q2 25
$101.9M
$268.1M
Q1 25
$101.2M
$275.2M
Q4 24
$98.6M
$222.9M
Q3 24
$98.5M
Q2 24
$93.8M
Q1 24
$92.3M
Total Assets
FUSB
FUSB
GLUE
GLUE
Q4 25
$1.2B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$459.8M
Q2 25
$1.1B
$359.6M
Q1 25
$1.1B
$393.2M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$438.7M
Q3 24
$1.1B
Q2 24
$1.1B
Q1 24
$1.1B
Debt / Equity
FUSB
FUSB
GLUE
GLUE
Q4 25
0.10×
Q3 25
0.10×
Q2 25
0.11×
Q1 25
0.11×
Q4 24
0.11×
Q3 24
0.11×
Q2 24
0.12×
Q1 24
0.12×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FUSB
FUSB
GLUE
GLUE
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$12.3M
$100.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$9.1M
$99.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
87.2%
781.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
31.1%
5.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
5.79×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$16.0M
$145.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FUSB
FUSB
GLUE
GLUE
Q4 25
$12.3M
Q3 25
$4.2M
$100.4M
Q2 25
$3.9M
$-34.7M
Q1 25
$1.8M
$-45.5M
Q4 24
$7.8M
$128.9M
Q3 24
$1.9M
Q2 24
$2.5M
Q1 24
$825.0K
Free Cash Flow
FUSB
FUSB
GLUE
GLUE
Q4 25
$9.1M
Q3 25
$3.6M
$99.8M
Q2 25
$1.6M
$-36.4M
Q1 25
$1.7M
$-47.1M
Q4 24
$5.7M
$128.7M
Q3 24
$1.3M
Q2 24
$2.3M
Q1 24
$-142.0K
FCF Margin
FUSB
FUSB
GLUE
GLUE
Q4 25
87.2%
Q3 25
34.2%
781.5%
Q2 25
16.0%
-157.0%
Q1 25
17.2%
-55.4%
Q4 24
58.2%
212.3%
Q3 24
12.7%
Q2 24
23.5%
Q1 24
-1.4%
Capex Intensity
FUSB
FUSB
GLUE
GLUE
Q4 25
31.1%
Q3 25
5.9%
5.1%
Q2 25
21.8%
7.3%
Q1 25
0.7%
1.9%
Q4 24
21.6%
0.3%
Q3 24
6.6%
Q2 24
2.0%
Q1 24
9.8%
Cash Conversion
FUSB
FUSB
GLUE
GLUE
Q4 25
5.79×
Q3 25
2.18×
Q2 25
25.16×
Q1 25
0.99×
-0.97×
Q4 24
4.53×
9.59×
Q3 24
0.87×
Q2 24
1.20×
Q1 24
0.39×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons