vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Future Vision II Acquisition Corp. (FVN) and Lakeshore Acquisition III Corp. (LCCC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lakeshore Acquisition III Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($717.3K vs $584.4K, roughly 1.2× Future Vision II Acquisition Corp.). Future Vision II Acquisition Corp. runs the higher net margin — 86.8% vs 67.9%, a 18.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Future Vision II Acquisition Corp is a special purpose acquisition company formed to pursue mergers, asset acquisitions, or business combinations with high-growth enterprises. It targets technology, consumer, and sustainable industry segments across North American and Asia-Pacific markets to drive long-term shareholder value.
FVN vs LCCC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $584.4K | $717.3K |
| Net Profit | $507.0K | $486.8K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -14.4% | -32.1% |
| Net Margin | 86.8% | 67.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $584.4K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $618.7K | $717.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.4K | $467.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | $612.4K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.8K | — |
| Q4 25 | $507.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $557.2K | $486.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $551.9K | $216.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $454.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.9K | — |
| Q4 25 | -14.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.2% | -32.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.5% | -53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 86.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 90.1% | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 89.8% | 46.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 96.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $61.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8M | $-1.6M |
| Total Assets | $62.1M | $71.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $61.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $62.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.6M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.0M | $70.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.4M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-99.4K | $-206.3K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.20× | -0.42× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-99.4K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1K | $-206.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.2K | $-218.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-190.1K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.01× | -0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.02× | -1.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.42× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
