vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. (FWRG) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $316.4M, roughly 1.8× First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.). On growth, First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (14.2% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Ruby Tuesday Inc. is an American multinational foodservice retailer that owns, operates, and franchises Ruby Tuesday restaurants. The concept was started in 1972 by Samuel E. (Sandy) Beall III.

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

FWRG vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.8× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$316.4M
FWRG
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FWRG
FWRG
+16.2% gap
FWRG
20.2%
4.0%
KIM
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FWRG
FWRG
Annualised
FWRG
14.2%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
FWRG
FWRG
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$316.4M
$558.0M
Net Profit
$166.3M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
2.9%
37.2%
Net Margin
29.8%
Revenue YoY
20.2%
4.0%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.24
$0.46

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FWRG
FWRG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$316.4M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$316.0M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$307.9M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$282.2M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$263.3M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$251.6M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$258.6M
$500.2M
Net Profit
FWRG
FWRG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
Q3 25
$3.0M
$137.8M
Q2 25
$2.1M
$163.0M
Q1 25
$-829.0K
$132.8M
Q4 24
$166.0M
Q3 24
$2.1M
$136.0M
Q2 24
$8.9M
$119.7M
Operating Margin
FWRG
FWRG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
2.9%
36.4%
Q3 25
3.2%
34.9%
Q2 25
2.4%
39.2%
Q1 25
0.4%
33.6%
Q4 24
1.5%
31.7%
Q3 24
2.5%
33.7%
Q2 24
6.4%
32.1%
Net Margin
FWRG
FWRG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
Q3 25
0.9%
25.7%
Q2 25
0.7%
31.0%
Q1 25
-0.3%
24.8%
Q4 24
31.6%
Q3 24
0.8%
26.8%
Q2 24
3.4%
23.9%
EPS (diluted)
FWRG
FWRG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$0.24
Q3 25
$0.05
Q2 25
$0.03
Q1 25
$-0.01
Q4 24
$0.01
Q3 24
$0.03
Q2 24
$0.14

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FWRG
FWRG
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$21.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$269.1M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$626.3M
$10.4B
Total Assets
$1.7B
$19.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.43×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FWRG
FWRG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$21.2M
$211.6M
Q3 25
$20.7M
$159.3M
Q2 25
$19.2M
$226.6M
Q1 25
$18.6M
$131.3M
Q4 24
$33.3M
$688.6M
Q3 24
$51.1M
$789.0M
Q2 24
$45.1M
$126.4M
Total Debt
FWRG
FWRG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$269.1M
$7.7B
Q3 25
$251.0M
Q2 25
$250.0M
Q1 25
$191.5M
Q4 24
$189.0M
$8.0B
Q3 24
$189.7M
Q2 24
$192.1M
Stockholders' Equity
FWRG
FWRG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$626.3M
$10.4B
Q3 25
$607.3M
$10.5B
Q2 25
$601.3M
$10.5B
Q1 25
$596.3M
$10.6B
Q4 24
$595.4M
$10.7B
Q3 24
$589.1M
$10.5B
Q2 24
$585.8M
$10.6B
Total Assets
FWRG
FWRG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$1.7B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$1.7B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$1.7B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$1.5B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$1.5B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$1.5B
$20.1B
Q2 24
$1.4B
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
FWRG
FWRG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.43×
0.74×
Q3 25
0.41×
Q2 25
0.42×
Q1 25
0.32×
Q4 24
0.32×
0.75×
Q3 24
0.32×
Q2 24
0.33×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FWRG
FWRG
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$18.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-18.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-5.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
11.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-31.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FWRG
FWRG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$18.5M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$47.9M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$39.4M
$305.4M
Q1 25
$20.1M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$22.9M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$35.9M
$295.9M
Q2 24
$31.9M
$294.1M
Free Cash Flow
FWRG
FWRG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-18.3M
Q3 25
$5.5M
Q2 25
$-1.7M
Q1 25
$-16.4M
$205.4M
Q4 24
$-17.7M
Q3 24
$6.8M
Q2 24
$2.3M
FCF Margin
FWRG
FWRG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
-5.8%
Q3 25
1.7%
Q2 25
-0.5%
Q1 25
-5.8%
38.3%
Q4 24
-6.7%
Q3 24
2.7%
Q2 24
0.9%
Capex Intensity
FWRG
FWRG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
11.6%
0.0%
Q3 25
13.4%
0.0%
Q2 25
13.4%
0.0%
Q1 25
13.0%
3.4%
Q4 24
15.4%
Q3 24
11.6%
Q2 24
11.5%
Cash Conversion
FWRG
FWRG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
Q3 25
16.01×
2.41×
Q2 25
18.72×
1.87×
Q1 25
1.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
Q3 24
16.98×
2.18×
Q2 24
3.59×
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FWRG
FWRG

In Restaurant Dining Sales$254.1M80%
Third Party Delivery Sales$38.6M12%
Take Out Sales$21.3M7%
Royalty And System Fund Contributions$2.3M1%

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

Related Comparisons