vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gambling.com Group Ltd (GAMB) and NaaS Technology Inc. (NAAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NaaS Technology Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.9M vs $15.9M, roughly 1.6× Gambling.com Group Ltd). Gambling.com Group Ltd runs the higher net margin — 0.4% vs -193.3%, a 193.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Gambling.com Group is a performance marketing and sports betting media company. The company provides digital marketing services for the online gambling industry.
NaaS Technology Inc. is a leading electric vehicle energy service provider based in China. It delivers one-stop solutions covering charging network operation, software and hardware support for charging station operators, and value-added services such as charging location search and payment for EV owners, serving both enterprise and individual customers across domestic and select overseas markets.
GAMB vs NAAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2022 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.9M | $25.9M |
| Net Profit | $56.0K | $-50.0M |
| Gross Margin | 96.9% | 29.2% |
| Operating Margin | -14.1% | -144.2% |
| Net Margin | 0.4% | -193.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 121.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 18.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 24 | — | $25.9M | ||
| Q2 22 | $15.9M | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $19.6M | — |
| Q2 24 | — | $-50.0M | ||
| Q2 22 | $56.0K | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $4.5M | — |
| Q2 24 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 22 | 96.9% | — | ||
| Q1 22 | 93.7% | — |
| Q2 24 | — | -144.2% | ||
| Q2 22 | -14.1% | — | ||
| Q1 22 | 21.8% | — |
| Q2 24 | — | -193.3% | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 22 | 22.9% | — |
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 22 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $0.12 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.1M | $24.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $85.0M | $-33.4M |
| Total Assets | $131.8M | $180.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 24 | — | $24.7M | ||
| Q2 22 | $31.1M | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $33.1M | — |
| Q2 24 | — | $-33.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | $85.0M | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $91.6M | — |
| Q2 24 | — | $180.2M | ||
| Q2 22 | $131.8M | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $139.6M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.4M | $-25.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 59.96× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 24 | — | $-25.7M | ||
| Q2 22 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $3.6M | — |
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 59.96× | — | ||
| Q1 22 | 0.80× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GAMB
| Performance Marketing | $12.3M | 77% |
| Sports | $3.8M | 24% |
NAAS
Segment breakdown not available.
