vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Gambling.com Group Ltd (GAMB) and VALUE LINE INC (VALU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Gambling.com Group Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.9M vs $8.3M, roughly 1.9× VALUE LINE INC). VALUE LINE INC runs the higher net margin — 71.4% vs 0.4%, a 71.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Gambling.com Group is a performance marketing and sports betting media company. The company provides digital marketing services for the online gambling industry.

Value Line, Inc. is a publicly traded investment research and financial publishing firm based in New York City. Founded in 1931 by Arnold Bernhard, Value Line is best known for publishing The Value Line Investment Survey, a stock analysis newsletter that tracks approximately 1,700 publicly traded stocks.

GAMB vs VALU — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GAMB
GAMB
1.9× larger
GAMB
$15.9M
$8.3M
VALU
Higher net margin
VALU
VALU
71.1% more per $
VALU
71.4%
0.4%
GAMB

Income Statement — Q2 FY2022 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
GAMB
GAMB
VALU
VALU
Revenue
$15.9M
$8.3M
Net Profit
$56.0K
$5.9M
Gross Margin
96.9%
Operating Margin
-14.1%
12.1%
Net Margin
0.4%
71.4%
Revenue YoY
-7.7%
Net Profit YoY
14.5%
EPS (diluted)
$0.00

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GAMB
GAMB
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
$8.3M
Q4 25
$8.6M
Q3 25
$8.6M
Q2 25
$8.4M
Q1 25
$9.0M
Q4 24
$8.8M
Q3 24
$8.9M
Q2 24
$9.0M
Net Profit
GAMB
GAMB
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
$5.9M
Q4 25
$5.7M
Q3 25
$6.5M
Q2 25
$4.0M
Q1 25
$5.2M
Q4 24
$5.7M
Q3 24
$5.9M
Q2 24
$4.8M
Operating Margin
GAMB
GAMB
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
12.1%
Q4 25
17.7%
Q3 25
17.4%
Q2 25
9.9%
Q1 25
17.4%
Q4 24
19.7%
Q3 24
20.8%
Q2 24
16.5%
Net Margin
GAMB
GAMB
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
71.4%
Q4 25
66.4%
Q3 25
75.1%
Q2 25
47.1%
Q1 25
57.6%
Q4 24
64.3%
Q3 24
66.3%
Q2 24
53.1%

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GAMB
GAMB
VALU
VALU
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$31.1M
$92.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$85.0M
$107.8M
Total Assets
$131.8M
$151.0M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GAMB
GAMB
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
$92.5M
Q4 25
$86.6M
Q3 25
$33.7M
Q2 25
$67.7M
Q1 25
$52.8M
Q4 24
$22.3M
Q3 24
$30.9M
Q2 24
$4.4M
Stockholders' Equity
GAMB
GAMB
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
$107.8M
Q4 25
$105.5M
Q3 25
$103.0M
Q2 25
$99.7M
Q1 25
$99.0M
Q4 24
$96.7M
Q3 24
$93.9M
Q2 24
$90.8M
Total Assets
GAMB
GAMB
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
$151.0M
Q4 25
$147.9M
Q3 25
$148.2M
Q2 25
$144.5M
Q1 25
$143.6M
Q4 24
$140.0M
Q3 24
$138.6M
Q2 24
$136.0M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GAMB
GAMB
VALU
VALU
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$3.4M
$5.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
59.96×
0.89×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GAMB
GAMB
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
$5.3M
Q4 25
$3.0M
Q3 25
$5.6M
Q2 25
$20.2M
Q1 25
$6.9M
Q4 24
$3.1M
Q3 24
$4.8M
Q2 24
$17.9M
Free Cash Flow
GAMB
GAMB
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
$20.1M
Q1 25
$6.8M
Q4 24
$3.0M
Q3 24
$4.8M
Q2 24
$17.9M
FCF Margin
GAMB
GAMB
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
239.2%
Q1 25
75.3%
Q4 24
34.1%
Q3 24
53.7%
Q2 24
199.0%
Capex Intensity
GAMB
GAMB
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
0.0%
Q4 25
0.0%
Q3 25
0.0%
Q2 25
2.1%
Q1 25
1.2%
Q4 24
0.7%
Q3 24
0.0%
Q2 24
0.2%
Cash Conversion
GAMB
GAMB
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
0.89×
Q4 25
0.52×
Q3 25
0.86×
Q2 25
5.12×
Q1 25
1.33×
Q4 24
0.54×
Q3 24
0.81×
Q2 24
3.75×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GAMB
GAMB

Performance Marketing$12.3M77%
Sports$3.8M24%

VALU
VALU

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons