vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC (GCBC) and Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.9M vs $22.2M, roughly 1.2× GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC). GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 46.3% vs -112.0%, a 158.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyperscale Data, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.4% vs 23.8%). GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($6.2M vs $-56.2M). Over the past eight quarters, GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (18.9% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Bank of Greene County is an American federally-chartered savings bank headquartered in Catskill, NY. The bank's branches are located in the Upstate New York counties of Greene, Columbia, Albany, Ulster, and Rensselaer.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
GCBC vs GPUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.2M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $10.3M | $-30.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | 52.0% | -117.8% |
| Net Margin | 46.3% | -112.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.8% | 38.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.4% | -6670.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.60 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $22.2M | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.5M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.5M | $25.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.9M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.6M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.7M | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | $10.3M | $-30.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $-445.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7M | $-33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 47.4% |
| Q4 25 | 52.0% | -117.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.4% | -57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.5% | -39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.6% | -25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.0% | -46.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.6% | -79.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.2% | -151.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.4% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | 46.3% | -112.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.2% | -53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.1% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.7% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.1% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.6% | -190.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.3% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.60 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.52 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.55 | $-2.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.47 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.44 | $-8.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.37 | $-24.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $-37.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.34 | $3.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $13.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $83.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $258.3M | $119.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.1B | $313.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $155.5M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.4M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $190.4M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $88.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $96.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $104.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.0M |
| Q4 25 | $258.3M | $119.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $248.2M | $55.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $238.8M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $229.0M | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.4M | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.0M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $199.2M | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $313.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $213.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $218.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $231.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $270.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $299.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.51× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.4M | $-37.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $6.2M | $-56.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 28.0% | -208.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 68.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.62× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $47.3M | $-87.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.4M | $-37.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.0M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $-10.2M |
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | $-56.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.3M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.4M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9M | $-11.6M |
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.4% | -84.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 133.3% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | -27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.6% | -47.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 141.2% | -33.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.3% | -30.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 68.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.2% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.70× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.95× | -2.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GCBC
Segment breakdown not available.
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
