vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GCL Global Holdings Ltd (GCL) and SILICOM LTD. (SILC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GCL Global Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($98.7M vs $61.9M, roughly 1.6× SILICOM LTD.). GCL Global Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — -5.2% vs -18.5%, a 13.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. SILICOM LTD. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.3M vs $-5.2M).
GCL Global Holdings Ltd is a leading clean energy enterprise focusing on R&D, production and operation of photovoltaic products, energy storage systems and low-carbon energy solutions. Its main markets cover Asia, Europe, North America, serving utility, commercial and residential distributed energy users across the globe.
Silicom Ltd. is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that specializes in the design, manufacture and marketing of connectivity solutions for a range of servers and server-based systems. Its shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Silicom is a member of the RAD Group family of companies.
GCL vs SILC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $98.7M | $61.9M |
| Net Profit | $-5.1M | $-11.5M |
| Gross Margin | 11.0% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | -6.7% | -19.8% |
| Net Margin | -5.2% | -18.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 16.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | $-2.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $61.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $58.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -22.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $16.6M | $42.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $52.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.1M | $117.5M |
| Total Assets | $159.9M | $152.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.57× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $72.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $117.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $127.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $152.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $150.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.8M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.2M | $-3.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.3% | -5.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.84× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.