vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GENESCO INC (GCO) and Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Liberty Energy Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $616.2M, roughly 1.7× GENESCO INC). Liberty Energy Inc. runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs 0.9%, a 1.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Liberty Energy Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.5% vs 3.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Liberty Energy Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-6.2% CAGR vs -8.7%).
Genesco Inc. is an American publicly owned specialty retailer of branded footwear and accessories and is a wholesaler of branded and licensed footwear based in Nashville, Tennessee. Founded back in 1924 as Jarman Shoe Company, a footwear manufacturer, the company changed its name to General Shoe Corporation in 1933, and became a public company in 1939. By 1957, its stock would be included in the first S&P 500 Index. The company took its current name, Genesco—an acronym derived from its earlie...
Liberty Energy Inc. is a North American energy services provider specializing in hydraulic fracturing and well completion solutions for oil and gas operators. It serves clients across major U.S. shale basins, offering low-emission equipment and tailored support to optimize well productivity.
GCO vs LBRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $616.2M | $1.0B |
| Net Profit | $5.4M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 46.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.4% | 2.2% |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.3% | 4.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 128.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $616.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $546.0M | $947.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $474.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.9M | $977.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $596.3M | $943.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $525.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $457.6M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $13.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.5M | $43.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.2M | $71.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.4M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $51.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.0M | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.3M | $108.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 46.8% | 20.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.8% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.7% | 22.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.9% | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.8% | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.8% | 26.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.3% | 27.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.6% | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.0% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.0% | 12.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.4% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.5% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.3% | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.50 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.79 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.02 | $0.43 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.16 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.76 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.91 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.23 | $0.64 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.0M | $699.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $89.5M | $7.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $513.8M | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $699.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.0M | $27.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.0M | $13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.7M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.0M | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.6M | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.9M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.2M | $30.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $89.5M | $246.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.1M | $190.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $513.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $506.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $522.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $547.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $516.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $532.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $548.5M | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.19× | 0.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-12.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-31.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | 13.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.41× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $23.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.9M | $195.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.3M | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-101.0M | $170.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.0M | $192.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.1M | $177.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.7M | $244.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.7M | $248.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-31.5M | $-10.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.7M | $-67.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-119.9M | $33.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.3M | $58.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.2M | $-26.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8M | $77.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-40.1M | $112.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.1% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.1% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.8% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.41× | 14.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.40× | 9.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.29× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GCO
| Journeys Group Segment | $376.7M | 61% |
| Schuh Group Segment | $123.8M | 20% |
| Johnston And Murphy Group Segment | $81.2M | 13% |
| Genesco Brands Segment | $34.6M | 6% |
| Store Restructuring | $3.9M | 1% |
LBRT
Segment breakdown not available.