vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GENESCO INC (GCO) and MODINE MANUFACTURING CO (MOD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MODINE MANUFACTURING CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($805.0M vs $616.2M, roughly 1.3× GENESCO INC). GENESCO INC runs the higher net margin — 0.9% vs -5.9%, a 6.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.5% vs 3.3%). MODINE MANUFACTURING CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-17.1M vs $-31.5M). Over the past eight quarters, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO's revenue compounded faster (15.5% CAGR vs -8.7%).
Genesco Inc. is an American publicly owned specialty retailer of branded footwear and accessories and is a wholesaler of branded and licensed footwear based in Nashville, Tennessee. Founded back in 1924 as Jarman Shoe Company, a footwear manufacturer, the company changed its name to General Shoe Corporation in 1933, and became a public company in 1939. By 1957, its stock would be included in the first S&P 500 Index. The company took its current name, Genesco—an acronym derived from its earlie...
Modine Manufacturing is a thermal management company established in 1916 in the United States. The company started as Modine Manufacturing Company by Arthur B Modine who patented the Spirex radiator for tractors. The Modine company manufactured the Turbotube radiator for Ford Model T cars. The company built the world's first vehicular wind tunnel in Racine, Wisconsin in 1941. During WWII, Modine manufactured aftercoolers for the P-51 Mustang fighter plane. After WWII, Modine introduced the Ai...
GCO vs MOD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $616.2M | $805.0M |
| Net Profit | $5.4M | $-47.4M |
| Gross Margin | 46.8% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | 1.4% | 11.1% |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | -5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.3% | 30.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 128.3% | -215.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | $-0.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $616.2M | $805.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $546.0M | $738.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $474.0M | $682.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.9M | $647.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $596.3M | $616.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $525.2M | $658.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $457.6M | $661.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $739.0M | $603.5M |
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $-47.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.5M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.2M | $51.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.4M | $49.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $41.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.0M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.3M | $47.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.2M | $25.8M |
| Q4 25 | 46.8% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.8% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.7% | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.9% | 25.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.8% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.8% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.3% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 46.3% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.6% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.9% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.0% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.0% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.5% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.50 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.79 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.02 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.16 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.76 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.91 | $0.86 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.23 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.29 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.0M | $98.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $89.5M | $570.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $513.8M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.0M | $98.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.0M | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.7M | $124.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.0M | $71.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.6M | $83.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.9M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.2M | $72.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.2M | $60.1M |
| Q4 25 | $89.5M | $570.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.0M | $525.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.0M | $482.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $296.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.1M | $330.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.8M | $359.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.4M | $405.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.7M | $399.9M |
| Q4 25 | $513.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $506.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $522.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $547.0M | $910.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $516.9M | $855.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $532.6M | $858.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $548.5M | $788.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $571.2M | $747.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.14× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | 0.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.19× | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.15× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.06× | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-12.9M | $24.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-31.5M | $-17.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.1% | -2.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | 5.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.41× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $23.5M | $-20.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-12.9M | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.3M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-101.0M | $27.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.0M | $54.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.1M | $60.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.7M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.7M | $40.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $118.3M | $39.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-31.5M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.7M | $-30.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-119.9M | $200.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.3M | $27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.2M | $44.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-40.1M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $107.8M | $-4.3M |
| Q4 25 | -5.1% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | -2.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.40× | 1.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.35× | 1.53× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GCO
| Journeys Group Segment | $376.7M | 61% |
| Schuh Group Segment | $123.8M | 20% |
| Johnston And Murphy Group Segment | $81.2M | 13% |
| Genesco Brands Segment | $34.6M | 6% |
| Store Restructuring | $3.9M | 1% |
MOD
| Data Centers | $296.9M | 37% |
| Performance Technologies | $266.0M | 33% |
| Hvac Technologies | $107.1M | 13% |
| Air Cooled | $92.4M | 11% |
| Lb White | $25.6M | 3% |
| Climate By Design | $10.2M | 1% |
| Absolutaire | $7.0M | 1% |
