vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GENESCO INC (GCO) and PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GENESCO INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($616.2M vs $349.1M, roughly 1.8× PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). GENESCO INC runs the higher net margin — 0.9% vs -10.8%, a 11.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs 3.3%). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($109.2M vs $-31.5M). Over the past eight quarters, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs -8.7%).
Genesco Inc. is an American publicly owned specialty retailer of branded footwear and accessories and is a wholesaler of branded and licensed footwear based in Nashville, Tennessee. Founded back in 1924 as Jarman Shoe Company, a footwear manufacturer, the company changed its name to General Shoe Corporation in 1933, and became a public company in 1939. By 1957, its stock would be included in the first S&P 500 Index. The company took its current name, Genesco—an acronym derived from its earlie...
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
GCO vs PCOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $616.2M | $349.1M |
| Net Profit | $5.4M | $-37.6M |
| Gross Margin | 46.8% | 80.1% |
| Operating Margin | 1.4% | -12.3% |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.3% | 15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 128.3% | 39.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | $-0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $616.2M | $349.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $546.0M | $338.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $474.0M | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.9M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $596.3M | $302.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $525.2M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $457.6M | $284.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $739.0M | $269.4M |
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.5M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.2M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.4M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $-62.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.0M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.3M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.2M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | 46.8% | 80.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.8% | 79.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.7% | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.9% | 79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.8% | 81.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.8% | 81.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.3% | 83.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 46.3% | 83.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.6% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.9% | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.0% | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.0% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | -7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.4% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.5% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.2% | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.3% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | -4.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.50 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.79 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.02 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.16 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.76 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.91 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.23 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.29 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.0M | $768.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $89.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $513.8M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.0M | $768.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.0M | $684.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.7M | $620.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.0M | $566.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.6M | $775.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.9M | $756.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.2M | $735.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.2M | $744.6M |
| Q4 25 | $89.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $513.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $506.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $522.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $547.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $516.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $532.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $548.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $571.2M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-12.9M | $114.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-31.5M | $109.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.1% | 31.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.41× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $23.5M | $282.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-12.9M | $114.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.3M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-101.0M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.0M | $66.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.1M | $29.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.7M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.7M | $58.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $118.3M | $69.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-31.5M | $109.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.7M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-119.9M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.3M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.2M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-40.1M | $56.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $107.8M | $67.1M |
| Q4 25 | -5.1% | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.8% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | -2.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GCO
| Journeys Group Segment | $376.7M | 61% |
| Schuh Group Segment | $123.8M | 20% |
| Johnston And Murphy Group Segment | $81.2M | 13% |
| Genesco Brands Segment | $34.6M | 6% |
| Store Restructuring | $3.9M | 1% |
PCOR
| US | $298.3M | 85% |
| Non Us | $50.9M | 15% |
