vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GENESCO INC (GCO) and StepStone Group Inc. (STEP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GENESCO INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($616.2M vs $586.5M, roughly 1.1× StepStone Group Inc.). GENESCO INC runs the higher net margin — 0.9% vs -21.0%, a 21.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, StepStone Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (73.0% vs 3.3%). StepStone Group Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($26.7M vs $-31.5M). Over the past eight quarters, StepStone Group Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (28.2% CAGR vs -8.7%).
Genesco Inc. is an American publicly owned specialty retailer of branded footwear and accessories and is a wholesaler of branded and licensed footwear based in Nashville, Tennessee. Founded back in 1924 as Jarman Shoe Company, a footwear manufacturer, the company changed its name to General Shoe Corporation in 1933, and became a public company in 1939. By 1957, its stock would be included in the first S&P 500 Index. The company took its current name, Genesco—an acronym derived from its earlie...
Rosetta Stone Inc. is an American education technology software company that develops language, literacy and brain-fitness software. Best known for its language-learning products, in 2013, the company expanded beyond language into education-technology with its acquisitions of Livemocha, Lexia Learning, Fit Brains, and Tell Me More. In 2021, it became a subsidiary of IXL Learning.
GCO vs STEP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $616.2M | $586.5M |
| Net Profit | $5.4M | $-123.5M |
| Gross Margin | 46.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.4% | -33.2% |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | -21.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.3% | 73.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 128.3% | 35.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | $-1.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $616.2M | $586.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $546.0M | $454.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $474.0M | $364.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.9M | $377.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $596.3M | $339.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $525.2M | $271.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $457.6M | $186.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $739.0M | $356.8M |
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $-123.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.5M | $-366.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.2M | $-38.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.4M | $-18.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $-192.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.0M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.3M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.2M | $30.8M |
| Q4 25 | 46.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 46.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | -33.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.6% | -148.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.9% | -5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | -101.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.0% | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.0% | 29.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | 26.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | -21.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.4% | -80.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.5% | -10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | -4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.2% | -56.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.50 | $-1.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.79 | $-4.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.02 | $-0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.16 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.76 | $-2.61 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.91 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.23 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.29 | $0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $89.5M | $270.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $513.8M | $-378.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $5.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $89.5M | $270.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.0M | $269.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.0M | $269.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $269.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.1M | $168.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.8M | $172.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.4M | $172.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.7M | $148.8M |
| Q4 25 | $513.8M | $-378.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $506.4M | $-233.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $522.2M | $153.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $547.0M | $179.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $516.9M | $209.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $532.6M | $397.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $548.5M | $366.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $571.2M | $324.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | 1.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 1.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.19× | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.15× | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.06× | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-12.9M | $27.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-31.5M | $26.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.1% | 4.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.41× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $23.5M | $18.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-12.9M | $27.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.3M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-101.0M | $46.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.0M | $-66.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.1M | $27.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.7M | $53.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.7M | $50.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $118.3M | $7.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-31.5M | $26.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.7M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-119.9M | $45.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.3M | $-69.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.2M | $27.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8M | $52.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-40.1M | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $107.8M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | -5.1% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.3% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | -18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.8% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | -2.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.35× | 0.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GCO
| Journeys Group Segment | $376.7M | 61% |
| Schuh Group Segment | $123.8M | 20% |
| Johnston And Murphy Group Segment | $81.2M | 13% |
| Genesco Brands Segment | $34.6M | 6% |
| Store Restructuring | $3.9M | 1% |
STEP
| Other | $210.1M | 36% |
| Management And Advisory Fees Net Focused Commingled Funds | $143.3M | 24% |
| Carried Interest Allocation Focused Commingled Funds | $85.1M | 15% |
| Carried Interest Allocation Separately Managed Accounts | $63.6M | 11% |
| Carried Interest Allocation Realized | $46.7M | 8% |
| Management And Advisory Fees Net Advisory And Other Services | $18.3M | 3% |
| Legacy Carried Interest Allocation Focused Commingled Funds | $10.3M | 2% |
| Income Based Incentive Fees | $6.0M | 1% |
| Management And Advisory Fees Net Fund Reimbursement Revenues | $3.1M | 1% |
