vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of General Dynamics (GD) and Coca-Cola Company (The) (KO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
General Dynamics is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.5B vs $11.8B, roughly 1.1× Coca-Cola Company (The)). Coca-Cola Company (The) runs the higher net margin — 19.2% vs 8.3%, a 10.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, General Dynamics posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.3% vs 2.4%). Coca-Cola Company (The) produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.9B vs $2.0B). Over the past eight quarters, General Dynamics's revenue compounded faster (6.1% CAGR vs 2.3%).
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S.
The Coca-Cola Company is an American multinational corporation founded in 1892 headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. It manufactures, sells and markets soft drinks including Coca-Cola, other non-alcoholic beverage concentrates and syrups, and alcoholic beverages. Its stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and is a component of the DJIA and the S&P 500 and S&P 100 indices.
GD vs KO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.5B | $11.8B |
| Net Profit | $1.1B | $2.3B |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.5% | 15.6% |
| Net Margin | 8.3% | 19.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 13.2% | 3.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.10 | $0.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $13.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.4B | $11.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9B | $12.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.0B | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.2B | $11.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.3B | $11.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.7B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0B | $12.4B |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $994.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $930.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $905.0M | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 61.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 62.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 62.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 60.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 61.1% |
| Q1 26 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.3% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 34.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.4% | 32.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 21.3% |
| Q1 26 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 30.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 24.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 19.5% |
| Q1 26 | $4.10 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.86 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.66 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.7B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.3B | $42.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $26.1B | $32.2B |
| Total Assets | $59.0B | $104.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.24× | 1.31× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $10.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $12.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $9.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $10.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $13.7B |
| Q1 26 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.1B | $42.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $43.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $45.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $43.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $42.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $43.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.1B |
| Q1 26 | $26.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.6B | $32.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.4B | $31.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.6B | $28.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.2B | $26.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.1B | $24.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.0B | $26.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.0B | $25.9B |
| Q1 26 | $59.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $57.2B | $104.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.6B | $106.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.9B | $104.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.6B | $101.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.9B | $100.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3B | $106.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.4B | $101.2B |
| Q1 26 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.32× | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.38× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | 1.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.47× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $3.8B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.0B | $2.9B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.5% | 24.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 7.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.2B | $5.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-148.0M | $-5.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $-1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $814.0M | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $952.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-290.0M | $-5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $-1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $613.0M | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.7% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 26.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.4% | -49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.5% | 27.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | -14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 25.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.37× | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.99× | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.58× | 1.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.15× | -1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.88× | 1.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.52× | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | 1.49× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GD
Segment breakdown not available.
KO
| Other | $7.0B | 59% |
| Finished Product Operations | $2.4B | 21% |
| Concentrate Operations | $2.4B | 20% |
