vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of General Dynamics (GD) and Schlumberger (SLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
General Dynamics is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.4B vs $8.7B, roughly 1.6× Schlumberger). Schlumberger runs the higher net margin — 8.6% vs 7.9%, a 0.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, General Dynamics posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.8% vs 2.7%). General Dynamics produced more free cash flow last quarter ($952.0M vs $103.0M). Over the past eight quarters, General Dynamics's revenue compounded faster (15.8% CAGR vs -2.3%).
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S.
SLB, formerly known as Schlumberger, is an American multinational oilfield services company. Founded in France in 1926, the company is now incorporated as SLB N.V. in Willemstad, Curaçao, with principal executive offices in four cities: Paris, France; Houston, Texas, United States; London, UK; and The Hague, Netherlands. As of 2022, it is both the world's largest offshore drilling company and the world's largest offshore drilling contractor by revenue.
GD vs SLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.4B | $8.7B |
| Net Profit | $1.1B | $752.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 7.9% | 8.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.8% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -0.4% | -5.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.4B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.0B | $8.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.2B | $8.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.3B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.7B | $9.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0B | $9.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $752.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $824.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $739.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $994.0M | $797.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $930.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $905.0M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 15.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 12.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.74 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.77 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.3B | $3.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.1B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $25.6B | $27.4B |
| Total Assets | $57.2B | $19.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.32× | 0.35× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $571.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $511.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $961.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $27.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.6B | $26.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.4B | $25.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.6B | $20.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.2B | $19.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.1B | $21.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.0B | $21.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.0B | $21.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $19.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $57.2B | $54.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.6B | $55.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.9B | $48.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.6B | $49.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.9B | $48.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3B | $49.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.4B | $49.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.6B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $952.0M | $103.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.6% | 1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.37× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.0B | $4.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-148.0M | $660.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $814.0M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $103.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $952.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $771.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-290.0M | $262.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $613.0M | $973.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.7% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.5% | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 10.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 5.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.37× | 3.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.99× | 2.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.58× | 1.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.15× | 0.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.88× | 2.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.52× | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | 1.29× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GD
| Aerospace | $3.8B | 26% |
| Cost Reimbursement | $2.5B | 17% |
| Information Technology Services | $2.1B | 15% |
| Militaryvehicles | $1.2B | 9% |
| C5ISR Solutions | $1.1B | 8% |
| Aircraft Services | $965.0M | 7% |
| Weapons Systemsand Munitions | $935.0M | 7% |
| Surfaceships | $920.0M | 6% |
| Engineeringand Other Services | $360.0M | 3% |
| Repairand Other Services | $344.0M | 2% |
| Contracts Accounted For Under Percentage Of Completion | $88.0M | 1% |
SLB
Segment breakdown not available.
