vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. (GDYN) and HARROW, INC. (HROW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.1M vs $89.1M, roughly 1.2× HARROW, INC.). HARROW, INC. runs the higher net margin — 7.4% vs -1.4%, a 8.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HARROW, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (33.3% vs 3.7%). Over the past eight quarters, HARROW, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (60.5% CAGR vs 12.0%).
Escape Dynamics, Inc. was a Colorado-based technology company that operated 2010–2015 focused on bringing to market single-stage-to-orbit reusable electromagnetically powered spaceplanes.
Harrow Health, Inc., formerly known as Imprimis Pharmaceuticals, is a publicly traded pharmaceutical company based in Nashville, Tennessee.
GDYN vs HROW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.1M | $89.1M |
| Net Profit | $-1.5M | $6.6M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 79.3% |
| Operating Margin | 61.7% | 17.5% |
| Net Margin | -1.4% | 7.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.7% | 33.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -150.6% | -2.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $104.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $106.2M | $89.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.2M | $71.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.1M | $63.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.4M | $47.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.3M | $66.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.4M | $49.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.0M | $48.9M |
| Q1 26 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $306.0K | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-817.0K | $-6.5M |
| Q1 26 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.0% | 79.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.3% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | 74.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.8% | 67.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.9% | 78.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.4% | 75.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | 74.4% |
| Q1 26 | 61.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.2% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | -23.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 3.1% |
| Q1 26 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | -37.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | -8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | -13.2% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $327.5M | $72.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $250.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $530.1M | $52.4M |
| Total Assets | $605.0M | $399.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.77× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $327.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $342.1M | $72.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $338.6M | $74.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $336.8M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $325.5M | $66.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | $47.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.3M | $72.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0M | $71.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $250.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $347.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $250.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $256.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $262.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $230.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $236.3M |
| Q1 26 | $530.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.1M | $52.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $537.7M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $532.2M | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $517.4M | $56.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $517.8M | $69.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $400.2M | $58.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.4M | $58.5M |
| Q1 26 | $605.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $612.9M | $399.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.2M | $363.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $608.9M | $345.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $590.9M | $364.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.2M | $389.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $477.3M | $351.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $443.6M | $306.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $8.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $8.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 9.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $43.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $8.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | $-803.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4M | $19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.7M | $-2.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $-969.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | $19.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $-18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | $-3.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | -1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 40.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | -27.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | -6.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.34× | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.92× | 16.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.73× | -0.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | -2.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
