vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. (GDYN) and Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. (KW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($120.6M vs $104.1M, roughly 1.2× GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.). Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 48.1% vs -1.4%, a 49.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.7% vs -11.0%). Over the past eight quarters, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs -6.0%).
Escape Dynamics, Inc. was a Colorado-based technology company that operated 2010–2015 focused on bringing to market single-stage-to-orbit reusable electromagnetically powered spaceplanes.
Kennedy Wilson is a real estate investment company headquartered in Beverly Hills, California, United States.
GDYN vs KW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.1M | $120.6M |
| Net Profit | $-1.5M | $58.0M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 61.7% | 57.3% |
| Net Margin | -1.4% | 48.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.7% | -11.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -150.6% | 32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $104.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $106.2M | $120.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.2M | $116.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.1M | $135.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.4M | $128.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.3M | $135.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.4M | $127.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.0M | $132.0M |
| Q1 26 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $306.0K | $58.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $-29.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $43.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | $-66.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-817.0K | $-48.3M |
| Q1 26 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 61.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 57.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.2% | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | -26.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 36.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | -60.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | -45.5% |
| Q1 26 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 48.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | -23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | -52.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | -36.6% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | $-0.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $327.5M | $184.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $530.1M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $605.0M | $6.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $327.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $342.1M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $338.6M | $382.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $336.8M | $309.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $325.5M | $356.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | $217.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.3M | $367.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0M | $366.5M |
| Q1 26 | $530.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $537.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $532.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $517.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $517.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $400.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.4M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $605.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $612.9M | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.2M | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $608.9M | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $590.9M | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.2M | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $477.3M | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $443.6M | $7.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-55.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -45.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 55.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.20× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-103.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | $42.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4M | $-51.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | $55.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.7M | $36.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | $-55.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9M | $-18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $29.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | $-59.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $-76.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9M | $-27.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | $-500.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | -45.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | -15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | -56.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | -21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | -0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 97.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 28.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.34× | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.92× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.73× | 7.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | 1.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GDYN
Segment breakdown not available.
KW
| Consolidated Portfolio Segment | $84.9M | 70% |
| Investment Management Fees | $30.4M | 25% |
| Real Estate | $5.1M | 4% |
