vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. (GDYN) and Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.3M vs $104.1M, roughly 1.4× GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.). GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. runs the higher net margin — -1.4% vs -31.4%, a 30.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.7% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs 0.0%).
Escape Dynamics, Inc. was a Colorado-based technology company that operated 2010–2015 focused on bringing to market single-stage-to-orbit reusable electromagnetically powered spaceplanes.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
GDYN vs PDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.1M | $143.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.5M | $-45.0M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 61.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -1.4% | -31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.7% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -150.6% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $104.1M | $143.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $106.2M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.2M | $139.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.1M | $140.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.4M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.3M | $143.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.4M | $139.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.0M | $143.3M |
| Q1 26 | $-1.5M | $-45.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $306.0K | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-817.0K | $-9.8M |
| Q1 26 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 61.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | -1.4% | -31.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | -20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | -6.8% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.02 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $327.5M | $2.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $530.1M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $605.0M | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $327.5M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $342.1M | $731.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $338.6M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $336.8M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $325.5M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | $109.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.3M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0M | $138.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $530.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $537.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $532.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $517.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $517.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $400.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.4M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $605.0M | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $612.9M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.2M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $608.9M | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $590.9M | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.2M | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $477.3M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $443.6M | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
