vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Great Elm Group, Inc. (GEG) and Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Solid Power, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.6M vs $3.0M, roughly 1.2× Great Elm Group, Inc.). On growth, Great Elm Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-14.1% vs -18.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Great Elm Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-4.6% CAGR vs -21.9%).
Great Elm Group, Inc. is an alternative asset management firm that offers private credit products, real asset investment vehicles, and customized capital solutions for small and medium-sized enterprises. It primarily serves institutional investors and high-net-worth individuals across the North American market.
Solid Energy was the largest coal mining company in New Zealand and is a state owned enterprise of the New Zealand Government.
GEG vs SLDP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.0M | $3.6M |
| Net Profit | $-16.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | 99.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -140.6% | -730.1% |
| Net Margin | -549.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -14.1% | -18.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1507.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.50 | $-0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.8M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8M | $6.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-16.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.9M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-25.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.5M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $-22.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-22.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.1M | $-21.2M |
| Q4 25 | 99.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 86.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 84.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -140.6% | -730.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -34.5% | -654.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -398.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -79.6% | -399.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -56.4% | -561.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -50.0% | -593.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -530.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -67.1% | -433.1% |
| Q4 25 | -549.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -73.3% | -693.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -390.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -140.1% | -251.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 66.1% | -482.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -438.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -111.2% | -356.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.50 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.24 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.17 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.04 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $51.2M | $250.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $55.8M | $415.7M |
| Total Assets | $135.5M | $455.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $51.2M | $250.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $53.5M | $251.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $230.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.5M | $240.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.3M | $118.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.1M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $140.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.1M | $146.6M |
| Q4 25 | $55.8M | $415.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.8M | $381.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $370.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.2M | $397.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.3M | $410.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.9M | $439.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $456.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $65.0M | $479.4M |
| Q4 25 | $135.5M | $455.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.0M | $416.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $398.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $137.2M | $419.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.5M | $448.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.3M | $470.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $492.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $148.4M | $516.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.9M | $-18.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-23.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -633.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 126.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-83.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | $-18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-26.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.8M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $-29.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-23.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-28.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-12.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-33.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | -633.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -397.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -264.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -476.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -416.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -271.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -305.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -556.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 126.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 41.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 105.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 86.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 68.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.19× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEG
| Management Service Base | $1.8M | 60% |
| Other | $1.2M | 40% |
SLDP
Segment breakdown not available.
