vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gen Digital (GEN) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.0× Snowflake Inc.). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs -24.2%, a 39.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Snowflake Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.7% vs 28.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Snowflake Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (25.1% CAGR vs 13.4%).
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
Snowflake Inc. is an American cloud-based data platform company founded in San Mateo, California, and headquartered in Bozeman, Montana. It operates a platform that supports data analysis and simultaneous access to data sets with minimal latency. It operates on Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform.
GEN vs SNOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $192.0M | $-294.0M |
| Gross Margin | 78.4% | 67.8% |
| Operating Margin | 34.9% | -27.2% |
| Net Margin | 15.5% | -24.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.5% | 28.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | 9.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $986.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $986.0M | $942.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $974.0M | $868.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.0M | $828.7M |
| Q1 26 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | $-294.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.0M | $-298.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-430.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.0M | $-327.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.0M | $-324.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | $-316.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.0M | $-317.0M |
| Q1 26 | 78.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.2% | 67.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.8% | 67.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 66.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.3% | 66.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.4% | 65.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.1% | 66.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.3% | 67.1% |
| Q1 26 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.9% | -27.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.5% | -29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -42.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | -39.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | -38.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.3% | -40.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | -42.1% |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | -24.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | -26.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -41.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | -33.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | -34.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | -36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | -38.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.21 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $-0.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.26 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $-0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $-0.95 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $15.8B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $883.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.0M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $4.6B |
| Q1 26 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $9.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.5B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $7.3B |
| Q1 26 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.33× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $137.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $113.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 9.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $776.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $541.0M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.0M | $74.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $228.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.0M | $432.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.0M | $101.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.0M | $69.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0M | $355.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.0M | $113.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | $58.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $183.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $470.0M | $421.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.0M | $88.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.0M | $64.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $262.0M | $338.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.9% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.5% | 42.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.2% | 40.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
SNOW
| Products | $1.2B | 96% |
| Professional Services And Other | $54.5M | 4% |
| Related Party | $6.7M | 1% |
