vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. (GENK) and Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($49.7M vs $26.9M, roughly 1.8× Hyperscale Data, Inc.). GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -3.8% vs -112.0%, a 108.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyperscale Data, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.4% vs -9.0%). GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-5.6M vs $-56.2M). Over the past eight quarters, GEN Restaurant Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.0% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Gen Korean BBQ is an American chain of all-you-can-eat Korean barbecue restaurants mainly concentrated around the Western U.S. It opened in 2011, and has since grown to 43 locations as of 2024.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
GENK vs GPUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $49.7M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $-1.9M | $-30.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | -24.5% | -117.8% |
| Net Margin | -3.8% | -112.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.0% | 38.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -821.4% | -6670.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.37 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $49.7M | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.4M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.0M | $25.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.3M | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.7M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.1M | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.9M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.8M | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | $-30.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-566.0K | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-261.0K | $-19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-301.0K | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-206.0K | $-445.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.0K | $-25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $277.0K | $-33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $496.0K | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 47.4% |
| Q4 25 | -24.5% | -117.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.4% | -57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.4% | -39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.8% | -25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.4% | -46.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | -79.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | -151.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | -3.8% | -112.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.1% | -53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.5% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.5% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.4% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | -190.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.37 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $-2.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $-8.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $-24.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | $-37.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.11 | $3.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.8M | $13.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $13.6M | $83.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $26.5M | $119.8M |
| Total Assets | $259.9M | $313.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.51× | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.7M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.2M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.1M | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | $13.6M | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.8M | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8M | $88.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5M | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $96.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $104.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.7M | $30.0M |
| Q4 25 | $26.5M | $119.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.1M | $55.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.8M | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.5M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.9M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $40.4M | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | $259.9M | $313.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.5M | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $246.3M | $213.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $232.4M | $218.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $240.4M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.7M | $231.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $218.8M | $270.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $214.5M | $299.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.51× | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.28× | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.19× | 16.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.15× | 14.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.16× | 11.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.16× | 38.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.17× | 4.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.19× | 0.51× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-426.0K | $-37.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.6M | $-56.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.3% | -208.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.5% | 68.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-24.3M | $-87.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-426.0K | $-37.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5M | $-10.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.6M | $-56.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.7M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.3M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.0K | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.8M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-586.0K | $-11.6M |
| Q4 25 | -11.3% | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.3% | -84.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.5% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | -27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | -47.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -13.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | -33.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.2% | -30.3% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 68.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.1% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.96× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.08× | -2.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GENK
Segment breakdown not available.
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
