vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GEO GROUP INC (GEO) and Skyworks Solutions (SWKS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Skyworks Solutions is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $708.4M, roughly 1.5× GEO GROUP INC). Skyworks Solutions runs the higher net margin — 7.6% vs 4.5%, a 3.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GEO GROUP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.6% vs 8.6%). Skyworks Solutions produced more free cash flow last quarter ($339.0M vs $-153.6M). Over the past eight quarters, GEO GROUP INC's revenue compounded faster (8.1% CAGR vs -0.5%).

The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) is a publicly traded C corporation headquartered in Boca Raton, Florida, that invests in private prisons and mental health facilities in the United States, Australia, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. The company's facilities include immigration detention centers, minimum security detention centers, and mental-health and residential-treatment facilities. GEO also operates government-owned facilities pursuant to management contracts. As of September 30, 2024, the ...

Skyworks Solutions, Inc. is an American semiconductor company headquartered in Irvine, California, United States. The company's shares are listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker symbol SWKS and is a constituent of the S&P 500.

GEO vs SWKS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SWKS
SWKS
1.5× larger
SWKS
$1.0B
$708.4M
GEO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GEO
GEO
+7.9% gap
GEO
16.6%
8.6%
SWKS
Higher net margin
SWKS
SWKS
3.2% more per $
SWKS
7.6%
4.5%
GEO
More free cash flow
SWKS
SWKS
$492.6M more FCF
SWKS
$339.0M
$-153.6M
GEO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GEO
GEO
Annualised
GEO
8.1%
-0.5%
SWKS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Revenue
$708.4M
$1.0B
Net Profit
$31.8M
$79.2M
Gross Margin
41.3%
Operating Margin
11.8%
10.0%
Net Margin
4.5%
7.6%
Revenue YoY
16.6%
8.6%
Net Profit YoY
105.1%
15.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.16
$0.53

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Q1 26
$1.0B
Q4 25
$708.4M
$1.1B
Q3 25
$682.3M
Q2 25
$636.2M
$965.0M
Q1 25
$604.6M
$953.2M
Q4 24
$607.7M
$1.1B
Q3 24
$603.1M
$1.0B
Q2 24
$607.2M
$905.5M
Net Profit
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Q1 26
$79.2M
Q4 25
$31.8M
$141.4M
Q3 25
$173.9M
Q2 25
$29.1M
$105.0M
Q1 25
$19.6M
$68.7M
Q4 24
$15.5M
$162.0M
Q3 24
$26.3M
$60.5M
Q2 24
$-32.5M
$120.9M
Gross Margin
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Q1 26
41.3%
Q4 25
40.7%
Q3 25
Q2 25
41.6%
Q1 25
41.1%
Q4 24
41.4%
Q3 24
41.9%
Q2 24
40.2%
Operating Margin
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Q1 26
10.0%
Q4 25
11.8%
10.1%
Q3 25
6.0%
Q2 25
11.3%
11.5%
Q1 25
10.1%
10.2%
Q4 24
11.2%
16.9%
Q3 24
13.7%
5.8%
Q2 24
13.2%
14.4%
Net Margin
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Q1 26
7.6%
Q4 25
4.5%
12.9%
Q3 25
25.5%
Q2 25
4.6%
10.9%
Q1 25
3.2%
7.2%
Q4 24
2.5%
15.2%
Q3 24
4.4%
5.9%
Q2 24
-5.4%
13.4%
EPS (diluted)
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Q1 26
$0.53
Q4 25
$0.16
$0.95
Q3 25
$1.24
Q2 25
$0.21
$0.70
Q1 25
$0.21
$0.43
Q4 24
$0.14
$1.00
Q3 24
$0.19
$0.36
Q2 24
$-0.25
$0.75

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$69.0M
$1.6B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.7B
$496.6M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.5B
$5.8B
Total Assets
$3.8B
$7.9B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.11×
0.09×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Q1 26
$1.6B
Q4 25
$69.0M
$1.4B
Q3 25
$183.9M
Q2 25
$67.9M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$64.8M
$1.5B
Q4 24
$76.9M
$1.7B
Q3 24
$70.6M
$1.6B
Q2 24
$46.3M
$1.3B
Total Debt
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Q1 26
$496.6M
Q4 25
$1.7B
$496.4M
Q3 25
Q2 25
$496.2M
Q1 25
$995.1M
Q4 24
$1.7B
$994.7M
Q3 24
$994.3M
Q2 24
$994.0M
Stockholders' Equity
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Q1 26
$5.8B
Q4 25
$1.5B
$5.8B
Q3 25
$1.5B
Q2 25
$1.4B
$5.7B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$5.9B
Q4 24
$1.3B
$6.4B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$6.3B
Q2 24
$1.3B
$6.3B
Total Assets
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Q1 26
$7.9B
Q4 25
$3.8B
$7.9B
Q3 25
$3.8B
Q2 25
$3.7B
$7.7B
Q1 25
$3.6B
$7.9B
Q4 24
$3.6B
$8.3B
Q3 24
$3.6B
$8.3B
Q2 24
$3.6B
$8.2B
Debt / Equity
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Q1 26
0.09×
Q4 25
1.11×
0.09×
Q3 25
Q2 25
0.09×
Q1 25
0.17×
Q4 24
1.31×
0.16×
Q3 24
0.16×
Q2 24
0.16×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-117.3M
$395.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-153.6M
$339.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-21.7%
32.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
5.1%
5.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-3.69×
4.99×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-124.9M
$1.1B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Q1 26
$395.5M
Q4 25
$-117.3M
$200.0M
Q3 25
$79.6M
Q2 25
$39.2M
$314.2M
Q1 25
$71.2M
$409.4M
Q4 24
$18.5M
$377.2M
Q3 24
$109.3M
$476.1M
Q2 24
$31.2M
$273.4M
Free Cash Flow
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Q1 26
$339.0M
Q4 25
$-153.6M
$144.0M
Q3 25
$-14.1M
Q2 25
$2.4M
$252.7M
Q1 25
$40.5M
$370.9M
Q4 24
$-2.3M
$338.2M
Q3 24
$90.5M
$393.3M
Q2 24
$6.8M
$249.0M
FCF Margin
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Q1 26
32.7%
Q4 25
-21.7%
13.1%
Q3 25
-2.1%
Q2 25
0.4%
26.2%
Q1 25
6.7%
38.9%
Q4 24
-0.4%
31.7%
Q3 24
15.0%
38.4%
Q2 24
1.1%
27.5%
Capex Intensity
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Q1 26
5.5%
Q4 25
5.1%
5.1%
Q3 25
13.7%
Q2 25
5.8%
6.4%
Q1 25
5.1%
4.0%
Q4 24
3.4%
3.6%
Q3 24
3.1%
8.1%
Q2 24
4.0%
2.7%
Cash Conversion
GEO
GEO
SWKS
SWKS
Q1 26
4.99×
Q4 25
-3.69×
1.41×
Q3 25
0.46×
Q2 25
1.35×
2.99×
Q1 25
3.64×
5.96×
Q4 24
1.19×
2.33×
Q3 24
4.15×
7.87×
Q2 24
2.26×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GEO
GEO

Us Corrections And Detention$498.0M70%
Electronic Monitoring And Supervision Services$83.7M12%
Reentry Services$72.2M10%
AU$49.1M7%
ZA$5.4M1%

SWKS
SWKS

Sales Channel Through Intermediary$915.6M88%
Sales Channel Directly To Consumer$119.8M12%

Related Comparisons