vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GERON CORP (GERN) and HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (HIVE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($93.1M vs $47.2M, roughly 2.0× GERON CORP). GERON CORP runs the higher net margin — -39.0% vs -98.1%, a 59.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (218.6% vs 67.1%). Over the past eight quarters, GERON CORP's revenue compounded faster (1597.0% CAGR vs 102.2%).
Geron Corporation is a biotechnology company located in Foster City, California which specializes in developing and commercializing therapeutic products for cancer that inhibit telomerase.
Mastech Digital, Inc. is a digital transformation and information technology (IT) services company headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, providing services to corporations across North America, Middle East, Asian, and Japan.
GERN vs HIVE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $47.2M | $93.1M |
| Net Profit | $-18.4M | $-91.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | -27.1% |
| Operating Margin | -29.4% | — |
| Net Margin | -39.0% | -98.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 67.1% | 218.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.3% | -234.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $93.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | $87.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.0M | $45.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.3M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $882.0K | $32.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $304.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.4M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.4M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.4M | $80.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-67.4M | $-18.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-55.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -43.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -29.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -99.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -7860.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -18465.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -98.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -39.0% | -18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.4% | 76.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -50.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 233.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -93.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7639.8% | -56.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18220.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.09 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $78.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.7M | $559.3M |
| Total Assets | $567.4M | $624.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.3M | $31.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $189.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $559.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $248.7M | $624.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $259.5M | $560.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $268.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $430.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $292.3M | $275.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $306.7M | $268.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $344.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $624.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $567.4M | $693.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $555.2M | $628.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $562.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $478.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $444.9M | $334.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $449.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $482.1M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-13.6M | $46.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.6M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-27.4M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-28.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-58.9M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-53.5M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-62.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-55.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-34.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-53.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-62.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -189.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -153.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6086.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -20680.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 92.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 143.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 202.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -26.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
