vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GERON CORP (GERN) and SolarMax Technology, Inc. (SMXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GERON CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($47.2M vs $46.6M, roughly 1.0× SolarMax Technology, Inc.). SolarMax Technology, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1.9% vs -39.0%, a 37.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SolarMax Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (623.5% vs 67.1%).
Geron Corporation is a biotechnology company located in Foster City, California which specializes in developing and commercializing therapeutic products for cancer that inhibit telomerase.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-efficiency solar PV modules and clean energy systems. It serves residential, commercial and industrial clients in North America and key Asia-Pacific markets, offering installation and after-sales support to boost low-carbon energy use.
GERN vs SMXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $47.2M | $46.6M |
| Net Profit | $-18.4M | $-872.2K |
| Gross Margin | — | 2.7% |
| Operating Margin | -29.4% | -2.7% |
| Net Margin | -39.0% | -1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 67.1% | 623.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.3% | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.0M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.6M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.3M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $882.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $304.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-872.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.4M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.4M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.4M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-67.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-55.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -29.4% | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.4% | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.2% | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -99.8% | -158.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7860.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -18465.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -39.0% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.4% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -50.1% | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -60.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -93.5% | -152.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7639.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -18220.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.09 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $78.1M | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.7M | $-12.2M |
| Total Assets | $567.4M | $91.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.1M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.7M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.7M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.3M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $189.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $248.7M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $259.5M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $268.2M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $292.3M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $306.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $344.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $567.4M | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $555.2M | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $562.5M | $38.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $444.9M | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $449.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $482.1M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-13.6M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.6M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-27.4M | $220.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.0M | $-601.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-58.9M | $203.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-53.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-62.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-53.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-62.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -6086.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -20680.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 202.3% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GERN
Segment breakdown not available.
SMXT
| Yabucoa | $35.9M | 77% |
| Other | $10.7M | 23% |
