vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GE Vernova (GEV) and PayPal (PYPL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GE Vernova is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.3B vs $8.4B, roughly 1.1× PayPal). GE Vernova runs the higher net margin — 50.9% vs 13.3%, a 37.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GE Vernova posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.3% vs 7.0%). GE Vernova produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.8B vs $903.0M). Over the past eight quarters, GE Vernova's revenue compounded faster (6.7% CAGR vs 2.9%).
GE Vernova, Inc. is an energy equipment manufacturing and services company headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The company operates through three main segments: Power, which designs, manufactures, and services gas, nuclear, hydro, and steam technologies; Wind, which provides onshore and offshore wind turbines and blades; and Electrification, which offers grid solutions, power conversion, solar and storage solutions, and digital technologies for the transmission, distribution, and manag...
PayPalPYPLEarnings & Financial Report
PayPal Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational financial technology company operating an online payments system in the majority of countries that support online money transfers; it serves as an electronic alternative to traditional paper methods such as checks and money orders. The company operates as a payment processor for online vendors, auction sites and many other commercial and company users.
GEV vs PYPL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.3B | $8.4B |
| Net Profit | $4.8B | $1.1B |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.8% |
| Net Margin | 50.9% | 13.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.3% | 7.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.9% | -13.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $17.44 | $1.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $9.3B | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.0B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1B | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0B | $7.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9B | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2B | $7.9B |
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $452.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $514.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $254.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $484.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-96.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.0% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.4% | 16.8% |
| Q1 26 | 50.9% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.4% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.1% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.8% | 14.3% |
| Q1 26 | $17.44 | $1.21 | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.28 | $1.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.64 | $1.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.86 | $1.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.91 | $1.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.75 | $1.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.35 | $0.99 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.65 | $1.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $9.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $20.0B |
| Total Assets | — | $80.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.47× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $10.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.2B | $20.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6B | $20.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.9B | $20.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | $20.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.5B | $20.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $20.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.1B | $20.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $80.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.0B | $80.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.4B | $79.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.1B | $79.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.6B | $81.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.5B | $81.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.9B | $83.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.1B | $84.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.8B | $903.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 51.3% | 10.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.5B | $5.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $980.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $367.0M | $898.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $921.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $979.0M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | $903.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $733.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.0M | $692.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $975.0M | $964.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $968.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $822.0M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | 51.3% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | 20.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.9% | 18.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.0% | 17.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.68× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.17× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.71× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.57× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.90× | 2.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.76× | 1.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEV
Segment breakdown not available.
PYPL
| Transaction revenues | $7.5B | 90% |
| Revenues from other value added services | $852.0M | 10% |
