vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GE Vernova (GEV) and SharkNinja, Inc. (SN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GE Vernova is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.3B vs $5.5B, roughly 1.7× SharkNinja, Inc.). On growth, SharkNinja, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.0% vs 16.3%). GE Vernova produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.8B vs $308.9M).
GE Vernova, Inc. is an energy equipment manufacturing and services company headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The company operates through three main segments: Power, which designs, manufactures, and services gas, nuclear, hydro, and steam technologies; Wind, which provides onshore and offshore wind turbines and blades; and Electrification, which offers grid solutions, power conversion, solar and storage solutions, and digital technologies for the transmission, distribution, and manag...
SharkNinja is a global product design and technology company based in Needham, Massachusetts. Founded in 1994 by Mark Rosenzweig and led by CEO Mark Barrocas, who joined the company in 2008 as president. The company's name is formed by combining its two primary brands: Shark and Ninja.
GEV vs SN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.3B | $5.5B |
| Net Profit | $4.8B | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 11.7% |
| Net Margin | 50.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 16.3% | 30.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $17.44 | $3.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $9.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $452.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $514.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $254.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $484.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-96.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.1% | 48.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 50.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | $17.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.28 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.64 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.86 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.91 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.75 | $3.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.35 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.65 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $363.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | — | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $363.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.5B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.1B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $446.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.8B | $308.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 51.3% | 5.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.5B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $980.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $367.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $921.0M | $446.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $979.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $733.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $975.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $308.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $968.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $822.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | 51.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.57× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.90× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.76× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
